Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
Figure 8.35.
Making sense of
deg(f, q ).
f(A 3 )
A 2
A 1
p 2
p 1
f(A 1 )
q
A 3
p 3
f(A 2 )
f
S 1
S 1
f(S 1 )
8.11.8. Theorem.
(1) The value deg(f, q ) does not depend on the choice of regular value q .
(2) If f, g : M Æ N are homotopic differentiable maps and if q and q ¢ are regular
values for f and g, respectively, then deg(f, q ) = deg(g, q ¢).
Proof.
See [Miln65b] or [Hirs76].
Theorem 8.11.8 means that the next two definitions are well defined.
Definition.
The degree of f , deg f, is defined to be deg(f, q ) for any regular value q
for f.
Definition. If g : M Æ N is any continuous map, then define the degree of g , deg g, to
be the degree of any differentiable map f : M Æ N that is homotopic to g.
8.11.9. Theorem. The definition of the degree of a map above agrees with the def-
inition of the degree of a map given in Section 7.5.1.
Proof. The proof is not hard, but the best way to prove this theorem is to use the
tangent bundle of a manifold, its relationship to orientability, and the connection
between that and the top-dimensional homology group of the manifold that we dis-
cussed in earlier sections.
Next, we use transversality to help shed more light on the duality in manifolds
that we discussed in Section 7.5.2. Let N k be a closed submanifold of a manifold W n+k .
We shall identify t N ≈n N with t W | N and assume that the normal n-plane bundle n N is
oriented with orientation m. Let ( M n ,s) be a closed compact oriented manifold. Con-
sider a differentiable map
n
f
: MW
Æ
that is transverse to N . We know that f -1 ( N ) consists of a finite number of isolated
points. Let p Πf -1 ( N ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search