Multimodal Integration: fMRI, MRI, EEG, and MEG - Advance Image Processing in Magnetic Resonance Imaging - page 247

4. George, J.S., Schmidt, D.M., Rector, D.M., Wood, C.C. (2002). Functional MRI:

An Introduction to Methods , chap. 19. Dynamic functional neuroimaging inter-
gratin multiple modalities. pp. 353-382. Oxford University Press.

5. Cohen, D. (1972). Magnetoencephalography: detection of the brain's electrical

activity with a superconducting magnetometer. Science 175: 664-666.

6. Hämaläinen, M., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Knuutila, J., and Lounasmaa, O.V.

(1993). Magnetoencephalography — theory, instrumentation, and applications to
noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Modern Phys. 65(2):
413-497.

7. Malmivuo, J. and Plonsey, R. (1995). Bioelectromagnetism — Principles and Applica-

tions of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields . Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.

URL: http://butler.cc.tut._/_malmivuo/bem/bembook/index.htm.
Okada, Y., Lahteenmaki, A., and Xu, C. (1999). Comparison of MEG and EEG 8.

on the basis of somatic evoked responses elicited by stimulation of the snout in

the juvenile swine. Clin. Neurophysiol . 110(2): 214-229.

9. Murakami, S., Hirose, A., and Okada, Y. (2003). Contribution of ionic currents to

magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) signals gen-
erated by guinea-pig CA3 slices. J. Physiol . 553 (Pt 3): 975-985.

10. Michel, C.M., Murray, M.M., Lantz, G., Gonzalez, S., Spinelli, L., and Grave De

Peralta, R. (2004). EEG source imaging. Clin. Neurophysiol . 115(10): 2195-2222.

11. Jung, T.-P., Makeig, S., Wester_eld, M., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., and

Sejnowski, T.J. (1999). Analyzing and visualizing single-trial event-related poten-
tials. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 11 , pp. 118-124.
MIT Press.

12. Tang, A.C., Pearlmutter, B.A., Zibulevsky, M., Hely, T.A., and Weisend, M.P.

(2000). An MEG study of response latency and variability in the human visual
system during a visual-motor integration task. in Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems 12 , pp. 185-191. MIT Press.

13. Tang, A.C., and Pearlmutter, B.A. (April 2003). Independent components of

magnetoencephalography: Localization and single-trial response onset detec-
tion. in Lu, Z.-L. and Kaufman, L., (Eds.). Magnetic Source Imaging of the
Human Brain , pp. 159-201. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, ISBN 0-8058-
4511-9.

14. Wikswo, J.P., Jr., Gevins, A., and Williamson, S.J. (1993). The future of the EEG

and MEG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol . 87(1): 1-9.

15. Cohen, D. and Halgren, E. (2003). Magnetoencephalography (neuromagnetism).

in Encyclopedia of Neuroscience 3rd ed. pp. 1-7. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

16. Malmivuo, J., Suihko, V., and Eskola, H. (1997). Sensitivity distributions of EEG

and MEG measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng . 44(3): 196-208.

17. Dale, A.M. and Sereno, M.I. (1993). Improved localization of cortical activity by

combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear
approach. J. Cog. Neurosci . 5(2): 162-176.

18. Baillet, S., Garnero, L., Marin, G., and Hugonin, J.P. (1999). Combined MEG

and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information. IEEE Trans.
Biomed. Eng. 46(5): 522-534.

19. Vrba, J. and Robinson, S.E. (2001). Signal processing in magnetoencephalogra-

phy. Methods 25(2): 249-271.

20. Mosher, J.C., Leahy, R.M., and Lewis, P.S. (March 1999). EEG and MEG: forward

solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng . 46(3): 245-260.