Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Chapter 6
Experimental Tests to Study the Influence
on the Shear Behavior of Fibers
of Different Characteristics
6.1 Introduction
Steel
ber reinforced concrete (SFRC) is a composite material that is characterized
by an enhanced post-cracking behavior due to the capacity of
bers to bridge the
crack faces. The enhanced toughness is mainly provided by bond and high-modulus
bers are more effective than straight
and crimped ones in enhancing the post-peak energy absorption capacity. The effect
of
bers in a suitable concrete matrix. Hooked
ber types seem
to act similarly in this regard [ 1 ]. Bencardino et al. [ 2 ] realized that the addition of
steel
bers on compressive strength is relatively small, and different
cantly
improves the post-peak behavior. In 2014, Banthia et al. [ 3 ] has ensured that, in
mixes reinforced with a single
bers with high aspect ratio into a high strength concrete matrix signi
ber, the Hooked-End
ber was signi
cantly better
in shear than the Double Deformed
ber.
On the other hand, the inclusion of
bers decreases the concrete workability.
This effect is more pronounced for
bers with higher aspect ratios.
uence shear behavior and shear
capacity guarantying the minimum shear reinforcement required by the current
Codes. SFRC makes possible a more distributed cracking pattern, where shear
cracks are characterized by smaller crack spacing and widths [ 4 ].
Many studies have advanced the knowledge in shear behavior of FRC beams.
Fiber content has a signi
Steel
bers in concrete can considerably in
fl
ber type was also
found to be influential since both of them influence the FRC toughness. Fibers with
a higher aspect ratio resulted in an increased shear strength due to the enhanced
post-cracking behavior compared to
cant effect on shear behavior, but the
bers with a low aspect ratio [ 2 , 5
7 ]. Hooked
-
steel
bers with a length of 60 mm allowed a larger shear crack opening when
compared to that observed in beams with 30 mm long
bers, but they were prone to
problems associated with
ber lumping along the longitudinal reinforcement. In
fact, horizontal clear spacing between reinforcing bars, no less than the
ber length,
is recommended [ 8 ].
Search WWH ::




Custom Search