Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
4 Performance:
4.1
Drill time in bone to be no worse
than existing 4.8 mm drills
4.2
Drill to perform consistently for 25
individual uses
4.3
Breaking torque to be no worse
than existing 4.8 drills
4.4
Bending strength to be no worse
than existing 4.8 drills
4.5
“Point” to locate hole securely to
within ± 1 mm
5 Sales:
5.1
Sales cost c £40 (gross margin
60%)
Sales report
5.2
Estimate 100 sold per month
Sales report
5.3
Should fit in std Jacob's Chuck
Sales report/follow-up
focus group
5.4
Packaging to be minimal
Sales report
5.5
Would be good to have a mark
every 5 mm between 60-90 mm to
estimate drill depth (UPS against
other drills)
Sales report
5.6
Can the flutes be gold in color to
match market leader?
Sales report
6 Manufacturing:
6.1
Invasive hence restricted to ISO
13485 subcontractors
Company policy
6.2
Device to be supplied clean in
batches
Standards review
6.3
Sharp edges to be protected
6.4
Finish to be to standard
Standards review
ASTM F86-04
ISO 9714-1:1991
BS 3531-5.5:1990
BS 7254-2:1990
6.5
No animal products to be used in
manufacturing
6.6
Device to be laser marked with CE
mark, dia., company logo, part
number, and lot number.
Standards review
93/42/EC
ASTM F86-04
ASTM F983-86
6.7
Materials restricted by standards
ISO 7153
ASTM F899-09
Search WWH ::




Custom Search