Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
environmental impact, it has been demonstrated clearly that this does not necessarily
hold; hence, objective assessment of the environmental burden of each process is
essential in product and process selection, in a similar manner to that used to ensure
economic feasibility.
Life cycle assessment (LCA) systematically identifies environmental impact and
opportunities to minimize it, and evaluates these (Curran 2000). It is supported by
a strong literature database and a well-defined methodology. A track record exists
for its use in the environmental assessment of biofuels (Kaltschmitt et  al., 1997;
Kim and Dale, 2005; von Blottnitz and Curran, 2007; Harding et al., 2008; Evans
et al., 2009). In conducting the LCA, setting the goal and scope of the study allows
for selecting a functional unit for comparison and setting the system boundaries.
A full inventory of the process flowsheet is required, including all raw materials
and energy, and all emissions and products generated. Data are preferably obtained
from operating plants; where this is not feasible in new process development, data
are obtained experimentally, from the literature or through modeling, and validated
through material and energy balancing. Typically, a cradle-to-gate approach is used
where the products formed are the same. Where the products formed differ from the
existing product and result in different emissions and by-products on use, a cradle-
to-grave approach is needed to consider product use and disposal. In both cases, the
raw material and energy requirements are expanded to include their pre-processing,
taking into account extraction from abiotic reserves, cultivation, agricultural pro-
cesses, etc. Typically, the impact of construction of the process plant and equipment
is negligible with respect to the impact of the operating plant. In new technology
environments, this should be verified. This has been demonstrated for algal bio-
diesel in all categories except land use (Lardon et al., 2009). Where reactors having
a short life span are used (e.g., polyethylene bags or PVC linings), these need to be
included in the analysis. For multiple products or by-products, as in the biorefinery,
environmental burden allocation or substitution is required to allocate the overall
burden representatively across the products formed. Burden allocation may be done
based on the mass or volume ratio of useful products or, in some cases, based on
cost. According to ISO (International Organization for Standardization) guidelines,
substitution is preferred where possible; that is, the additional product or by-product
is accounted for through the inventory typical of its conventional process route. This
handling of multiple products is important as typically the production of multiple
biofuels has been shown to increase the material and energy efficiency and process
economics of biomass utilization (Kaparaju et al., 2009).
Life cycle inventory (LCI) data are used in life cycle impact assessments (LCIAs),
typically using appropriate software to group the impacts into a manageable set of
impact categories (mid-point categories), such as abiotic depletion, global warming,
eutrophication, acidification, toxicity, etc. These may be further grouped into end-
point categories, such as human health, climate change, and ecosystem quality,
where appropriate.
The importance of the holistic study, considering all aspects of resource utilization
and emission generation, is demonstrated through early-stage biofuel analyses where
the carbon benefits of land use were counted for first-generation biofuels; however,
the emissions caused by clearing of the land to grow new feedstock (land-use
Search WWH ::




Custom Search