Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
188. Fisher AA. Lasers and allergic contact dermatitis to topical antibiotics,
with particular reference to bacitracin. Cutis 1996; 58: 252.
189. Dooms-Goossens A, Degreef H. Contact allergy to petrolatums. II.
Attempts to identify the nature of allergens. Contact Dermat 1983; 9: 247.
190. Hinman CC, Maibach H, Winter GD. Effect of air exposure and occlu-
sion on experimental human skin wounds. Nature 1963; 200: 377.
191. Schilling RSF, Roberts M, Goodman N. Clinical trial of occlusive plastic
dressings. Lancet 1950; 1: 293.
192. Hunter GR, Change FC. Outpatient burns: a prospective study. J Trauma
1976; 16: 191.
193. Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. 'Inert' vehicles do affect wound healing.
J Invest Dermatol 1980; 74: 90.
194. Martin A. The Use of antioxidants in healing. Dermatol Surg 1996; 22: 156.
195. O'Donnell-Torney J, Nathan CF, Lanks K. Secretion of pyruvate: an anti-
oxidant defense of mammalian cells. J Exp Med 1987; 165: 500.
196. Shacter E. Serum-free medium for growth factor-dependent and inde-
pendent plastocytomas and hybridomas. J Immunol Meth 1987; 99: 259.
197. Winter GD. Formation of scab and rate of epithelialization of superfi cial
wounds in the skin of the domestic pig. Nature 1962; 193: 293.
198. Rovee DY, Kurowsky CA, Lobun J, et al. Effect of local wound environ-
ment on epidermal healing. In: Maibach HL, Rovee DT, eds. Epidermal
Wound Healing. Chicago: Year Book, 1972.
199. Geronemus RG, Robins P. The effect of two new dressings on epidermal
wound healing. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1982; 8: 850.
200. Mandy S. A new primary wound dressing made of polyethylene oxide
gel. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1983; 9: 153.
201. May SR. Physiology, immunology and clinical effi cacy of an adherent
polyurethane wound dressing: Op-Site. In: Wise DL, ed. Burn Wound
Coverings. vol 2 Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1984.
202. Eaglstein WH, Mertz PM. New methods for assessing epidermal wound
healing: the effects of triamcinolone acetonide and polyethylene fi lm
occlusion. J Invest Dermatol 1978; 71: 382.
203. Barnett A, Berkowitz RL, Mius R, et al. Comparison of synthetic adhe-
sive moisture vapor permeable and fi ne mesh gauze dressings for split-
thickness skin graft donor sites. Am J Surg 1983; 145: 379.
204. Van Rijswijk L, Brown D, Friedman S, et al. Multicenter clinical evalua-
tion of hydrocolloid dressing for leg ulcers. Cutis 1985; 35: 173.
205. Eaton AC. A controlled trial to evaluate and compare a sutureless skin
closure technique (Op-Site skin closure) with conventional skin sutur-
ing and clipping in abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 1980; 67: 857.
206. Kannon GA, Garrett AB. Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings:
a clinical review. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 583.
207. Eaglstein WH. Experiences with biosynthetic dressings. J Am Acad Der-
matol 1985; 12: 434.
208. Bolton LL, Johnson CL, Rijswijk LV. Occlusive dressings: therapeutic
agents and effects on drug delivery. Clin Dermatol 1992; 9: 573.
209. Winter GD. Epidermal regeneration studied in the domestic pig. In:
Maibach HL, Rovee DT, eds. Epidermal Wound Healing. Chicago: Year
Book, 1972.
210. Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. The effect of occlusive dressings
on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialization in superfi cial wounds.
J Surg Res 1983; 35: 142.
211. Brown GL, Curtsinger L III, Brightwell JR, et al. Enhancement of epider-
mal regeneration by biosynthetic epidermal growth factor. J Exp Med
1986; 163: 1319.
212. Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mehle AL, Mertz PM. Optimal use of an occlu-
sive dressing to enhance healing: effect of delayed application and early
removal on wound healing. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124: 392.
213. Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. The effect of semi-occlusive dressing on
the microbial population in superfi cial wounds. Arch Surg 1984;
119: 287.
214. Geronemus RG, Mertz PM, Eaglstein WH. The effects of topical antimi-
crobial agents. Arch Dermatol 1979; 115: 1311.
215. Linsky CB, Rovee DT, Dow T. Effect of dressing on wound infl ammation
and scar tissue. In: Dineen P, Hildick-Smith G, eds. The Surgical Wound.
Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1981.
216. Marples RR. The effect of hydration on the bacterial fl ora of the skin.
In: Maibach HI, Hildick-Smith G, eds. Skin Bacteria and Their Role in
Infection. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
217. Buchan IA, Andrews JK, Lang SM. Laboratory investigation of the com-
position and properties of pig skin wound exudate under Op-Site. Burns
1981; 8: 39.
218. Buchan IA, Andrews JK, Lang SM. Clinical and laboratory investigation
of the composition and properties of human skin wound exudate under
semi-permeable dressing. Burns 1981; 7: 326.
219. Oliveria-Gandia M, Davis SC, Mertz PM. Can occlusive dressing compo-
sition infl uence proliferation of bacterial wound pathogens? Wounds
1998; 10: 4.
220. Hutchison JJ, McGuckin M. Occlusive dressings: a microbiologic and
clinical review. Am J Infect Control 1990; 18: 257.
221. Handfi eld-Jones SE, Grattan CEH, Simpson RA, et al. Comparison of a
hydrocolloid dressing and paraffi n gauze in the treatment of venous
ulcers. Br J Dermatol 1988; 118: 425.
222. Gilchrist B, Reed C. The bacteriology of chronic venous ulcers treated
with occlusive hydrocolloid dressings. Br J Dermatol 1989; 121: 337.
223. Leydon JL, Steward R, Kligman AM. Updated in vivo methods for evalu-
ating topical antimicrobial agent on human skin. J Invest Dermatol
1979; 72: 165.
224. Mertz PM, Ovington LG. Wound healing microbiology. Dermatol Clin
1993; 11: 739.
225. Christian MM, Behroozan DS, Moy RI. Delayed infections following
full-face CO
2
laser resurfacing and occlusive dressing use. Dermatol Surg
2000; 26: 32.
226. Fitzpatrick RE, Geronemus RG, Grevelink JM, et al. The incidence of
adverse healing reactions occurring with UltraPulse CO
2
resurfacing
during a multicenter study. Lasers Surg Med Suppl 1996; 8: 34.
227. Yurt RW. Burns. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell,
Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases.
New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995.
228. Phillips LG, Heggers JP, Robson MC, et al. The effect of endogenous skin
bacteria on burn wound infection. Ann Plast Surg 1989; 23: 35.
229. Husain MT, Karim QN, Tajuri S. Analysis of infection in a burn ward.
Burns 1989; 15: 299.
230. Shalita A. Personal communication. Int J Dermatol 1997; 36: 783-7.
231. Roberts TL, Lettieri JT, Ellis LB. CO
2
laser resurfacing: recognizing and
minimizing complications. Aesth Surg Q 1996; 16: 141.
232. Coates J. Basic physics of erbium laser resurfacing. J Cutan Laser Ther
1999; 1: 71.
233. Walsh JT, Deutsch TF. Er:YAG laser ablation of tissue: measurement of
ablation rates. Lasers Surg Med 1989; 9: 327.
234. Hibst R, Kaufmann R. Fundamentals of pulsed UV and mid-infrared
laser skin ablation. In: Steiner R, Kaufmann R, Landthaler M, Braun-
Falco O, eds. Lasers in Dermatology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
235. Hohenleutner U, Hohenleutner S, Bäumler Landthaler M. Fast and
effective skin ablation with an Er:YAG laser: determination of ablation
rates and thermal damage zones. Lasers Surg Med 1997; 20: 242.
236. McDaniel DH, Ash K, Lord J, et al. The Er : YAG laser: a review and pre-
liminary report on resurfacing of the face, neck and hands. Aesthetic
Surg J 1997; 17: 157.
237. Hibst R, Kaufmann R. Effects of laser parameters on pulsed Er : YAG
laser skin ablation. Lasers Med Sci 1991; 6: 391.
238. Kaufmann R, Hartmann A, Hibst R. Cutting and skin ablative properties
of pulsed mid-infrared laser surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1994; 20:
112.
239. Walsh JT, Flotte TJ, Deutsch TF. Er:YAG laser ablation tissue: effect of
pulse duration and tissue type on thermal damage. Lasers Surg Med
1989; 9: 314.
240. Kaufmann R, Hibst R. Vergleich verschildener Mittelin-frafot: Laser für
die ablation der Hauset. Lasermedizin 1995; 11: 19.
241. Walsh JT. Pulsed Laser Ablation Of Tissue: Analysis of the Removal Pro-
cess and Tissue Healing. Cambridge, MA: PhD thesis, MIT archives,
1988.
242. Wolbarsht ML. Laser surgery: CO
2
or HF.IEEE. J Quantum Electronics
1984; 20: 1427.
243. Kaufmann R, Hibst R. Pulsed UV and mid-infrared laser skin ablation:
experimental and fi rst clinical results. In: Steiner R, Kaufmann R,
Landthaler M, Braun-Falco O, eds. Lasers in Dermatology. Berlin:
Springer-Verlag, 1991.
244. Hughes PS. Skin contraction following Er:YAG laser resurfacing. Der-
matol Surg 1998; 24: 109.
245. Goldberg DJ, Cutler KB. The use of the Er:YAG laser for the treatment of
class III rhytids. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25: 713.
246. Weinstein C. Computerized scanning Er:YAG laser for skin resurfacing.
Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 83.
