Summary of studies used in the comparative assessments - Runoff Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Synthesis across Processes, Places and Scales - page 404

Table A8.2. Summary of information provided for the studies included in the Level 2 assessment, listing of studies with
more detailed information about catchment characteristics and cross-validation performances

No. of
catchments Method

Area
(km 2 )

Elevation
(m)

Aridity
( − ) Study Region P A (mm) E PA (mm) T A ( C)

Eng et al.
( 2011 )

USA 1063 SR 3 - 2600 320 - 4600 390 - 1200 − 2.0 - 22.5 5 - 3650 0.1 - 2.1

Plasse and
Sauquet
( 2010 )

France 607 GR, RR, G 10 - 1940 660 - 2200 480 - 1250 1.8 - 13.8 35 - 2250 0.3 - 1.7

Engeland
and Hisdal
( 2009 )

Norway 51 RR 6 - 1900 650 - 2700

− 2.2 - 6.5

180 - 1300

Laaha et al.
( 2013 )

Austria 300 G 2 - 1700 470 - 2030 175 - 1000 2.2 - 10.1 200 - 2950 0.1 - 1.2

−

Laaha and
Blöschl
( 2006a )

Austria 325 RR 7 - 960 470 - 2100 170 - 650

− 2.5 - 10.0

200 - 2950 0.2 - 1.3

Laaha and
Blöschl
( 2005 )

Austria 131 SR 7 - 960 470 - 2100 170 - 650

− 2.5 - 10.0

200 - 2950 0.2 - 1.3

The catchment attributes and performance for a particular regionalisation method are available for each catchment and include: area, mean
catchment elevation, mean annual precipitation (P A ), mean annual potential evaporation (E PA ) and mean annual air temperature (T A ).
Groups of regionalisation methods: global regression methods (GR), regional regression methods (RR), short record methods (SR) and
geostatistical methods (G).