Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
magnetization component My as follows:
"
#
exp
d
2
2
C exp
ð
t
=
tÞ
ð
y
n
t
Þ
M
y
¼
cos
ð
k
0
y
o
t
þ fÞ;
ð
7
:
3
Þ
d
4
þ b
2
t
2
4
ðd
4
þ b
2
t
2
Þ
where C is a constant proportional to the amplitude,
t
is the decay time,
f
is the
initial phase,
n
=
qo
/
q
k (k=k
0
) and
b
=(1/2)
q
2
o
/
q
k
2
(k=k
0
) are the coefficients
of the first and second order terms, respectively, in the Taylor expansion of the
nonlinear dispersion,
o
(k). The dispersion relation for spin waves propagating
orthogonally to the magnetization is given by
n
o
1
=
2
2
1
exp
ð
2kd
Þ
o ¼ g
8
p
K
þð
2
p
M
s
Þ
½
;
ð
7
:
4
Þ
where d is the thickness of the film. In numerical simulations, we used NiFe
material characteristics: A=1.6
10
6
erg.cm
1
,4
p
M
s
=10 kG, 2K/M
s
=4Oe,
g
=19.91
10
6
rad/s Oe,
a
=0.0097, known from the literature [1, 18]. Taking the
fitting parameters for the wave packet obtained in [2], we use
t
=0.6 ns,
k
0
=0.25
m
m
1
and
d
=5.7
m
m for d=27 nm. In Figure 7.17, we have show the
results of numerical simulations illustrating spin-wave packet propagation.
The distance between the excitation point and the point of observation is
50
m
m. The spin waves produce perturbation in spin orientation perpendicular to
the direction of magnetization, whose amplitude is much less than the saturation
magnetization M
y
=
M
s
1.
50
μ
m
2
0
−
2
0
1
2
3
4
5
Time (ns)
Figure
7.17.
Numerical simulations results: propagation of a spin-wave packet.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search