Design of Experiments - Design of Experiments for Reinforcement Learning - page 65

Ridge, E. & Kudenko, D. (2008). Determining whether a problem characteristic affects heuris-
tic performance. A rigorous design of experiments approach. In Cotta, C. & van Hemert,
J. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Evolutionary Computation for Combinatorial Optimization.
Springer, Studies in Computational Intelligence , volume 153 (pp. 21-35). New York, NY:
Springer.
Robbins, H. (1952). Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments. Bulletin of the American
Mathematical Society , 58(5), 527-535.
Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., & Wynn, H. P. (1989). Design and analysis of computer
experiments. Statistical Science , 4(4), 409-423.
Santner, T. J., Williams, B. J., & Notz, W. (2003). The Design and Analysis of Computer
Experiments . New York, NY: Springer.
Shang, J. S., Li, S., & Tadikamalla, P. (2004). Operational design of a supply chain system using
the taguchi method, response surface methodology, simulation, and optimization. International
Journal of Production Research , 42(18), 3823-3849.
Shilane, D., Martikainen, J., Dudoit, S., & Ovaska, S. J. (2008). A general framework for statis-
tical performance comparison of evolutionary computation algorithms. Information Sciences ,
178(14), 2870-2879.
Sobol', I. M. (1967). On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of
integrals. U.S.S.R. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics , 7(4), 86-112.
Staum, J. (2009). Better simulation metamodeling: The why, what, and how of stochastic kriging.
In Rossetti, M. D., Hill, R. R., Johansson, B., Dunkin, A., & Ingalls, R. G. (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, Austin, TX, 13-16 December (pp. 119-133). doi:
10.1109/WSC.2009.5429320
Sudret, B. (2012). Meta-models for structural reliability and uncertainty quantification. In Phoon,
K., Beer, M., Quek, S., & Pang, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5 th Asian-Pacific Symposium on
Structural Reliability and its Applications (APSSRA 2012), Singapore, 23-25 May (pp. 53-76).
Singapore: Research Publishing Services.
Tuffin, B. (1998). On the use of low discrepancy sequences in Monte Carlo methods. Monte Carlo
Methods and Applications , 2(4), 295-320.
van Beers, W. C. M. & Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2004). Kriging interpolation in simulation: A survey.
In Ingalls, R. G., Rossetti, M. D., Smith, J. S., & Peters, B. A., editors, Proceedings of the
2004 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, D.C., 5-8 December (pp. 113-121). doi:
10.1109/WSC.2004.1371308
Vining, G. G. (2008). Adapting response surface methodology for computer and simulation ex-
periments. In Tsubaki, H., Nishina, K., & Yamada, S. (Eds.), The Grammar of Technology
Development (pp. 127-134). Japan: Springer.
Williams, B. J., Santner, T. J., & Notz, W. I. (2000). Sequential design of computer experiments to
minimize integrated response functions. Statistica Sinica , 10(4), 1133-1152.
Wu, Y. T., Millwater, H. R., & Cruse, T. A. (1990). Advanced probabilistic structural-analysis
method for implicit performance functions. Journal of the American Institute of Aeronautics
and Astronautics , 28(9), 1663-1669.
Zurada, J. M., Malinowski, A., & Cloete, I. (1994). Sensitivity analysis for minimization of input
data dimension for feedforward neural network. In IEEE International Symposium on Cir-
cuits and Systems (ISCAS), London, England, 30 May-2 June (Vol. 6, pp. 447-450). doi:
10.1109/ISCAS.1994.409622