Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 1 a The location of stable isotope and SST data compiled in the project. b Scores of the rst
EOF with the 95 % con dence interval (age uncertainty set to 5 ka and temperature uncertainty set
to 1
C) compared to the Antarctic temperature change during MIS 11 (Jouzel et al. 2007 ), c Scores
of the second EOF with the 95 % con dence interval (age uncertainty set to 5 ka and temperature
uncertainty set to 1
°
13 C values of the North Atlantic used as a
proxy for North Atlantic Deepwater (NADW) production (see also Lisiecki et al. 2008 )
°
C) compared to deep water mean
δ
3 Key Findings
The EOF analysis reveals two main SST modes (Fig. 1 b, c), which explain nearly
70 % of the variation in the dataset, with 49 % explained by EOF1 and * 18 %
explained by EOF2. Although we found a stronger in
uence of temperature
uncertainty on the EOF robustness compared to the uncertainty of the age model
and reduction of number of records included into analysis, both the shape of the
rst
two EOFs and the amount of variance explained by them are remarkably robust to
age-model and temperature uncertainties (Milker et al. 2013 ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search