Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
2.3.3 Correlation between averaged sticking efficiencies and E. coli cell properties
In both DI and AGW there was no significant correlation between the strain averaged sticking
efficiency,
, and cell sphericity, outer surface potential or hydrophobicity ( Tables 2.2 and
Α
strain
2.3 ) .
Table 2.2:
Correlation matrix between the strain averaged sticking efficiency ( strai Α ) and
cell surface properties for the experiments in DI. P values are in brackets and
statistically significant (
p
0.05
) correlations are in bold.
Motility
Ag43
Hydrophobicity
Zeta
Α
strain
potential
Motility
0.724
(0.052)
Ag43
0.815
(0.046)
0.706
(0.092)
Hydrophobicity
0.080
(0.440)
-0.261
(0.309)
0.064
(0.459)
Zeta potential
-0.006
(0.496)
0.337
(0.257)
0.475
(0.209)
-0.634
(0.088)
Sphericity
-0.110
(0.418)
-0.284
(0.293)
0.315
(0.303)
-0.25
(0.316)
0.663
(0.076)
Table 2. 3:
Correlation matrix between the strain averaged sticking efficiency ( strai Α ) and
cell surface properties for the experiments in AGW. P values are in brackets.
Motility
Ag43
Hydrophobicity
Zeta
potential
Α
strain
Motility
0.423
(0.202)
Ag43
0.741
(0.076)
0.706
(0.092)
Hydrophobicity
0.531
(0.139)
-0.515
(0.148)
-0.169
(0.393)
Zeta potential
0.229
(0.332)
-0.218
(0.339)
0.033
(0.479)
0.294
(0.286)
Sphericity
-0.080
(0.44)
-0.284
(0.293)
0.315
(0.303)
0.068
(0.449)
0.074
(0.444)
In order to avoid underestimating the low sticking efficiency values, when calculating the mean
of all strai Α values per experiment, we also computed the average of the log-transformed values.
However, the differences between the average sticking efficiency, strai Α , and the average of the
log-transformed sticking efficiency were negligible, and we therefore did not consider log-
transformed averaged sticking efficiencies. In DI, however, there was a high positive correlation
between Ag43 expression and the strain averaged sticking efficiency ( r = 0.815, p = 0.046) and
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search