Databases Reference
In-Depth Information
Exhibit 27-4. Example of primary key problems.
Data File “A”
Identifier
Last Name
Sex
Age
Smoker
523
Smith
M
00
N
524
Jones
F
23
Y
526
Lee
M
42
527
Frank
17
Y
528
Yu
M
00
N
Data File “D”
Last Name
First Name
Department
Yrs Employed
Salary
Smith
Fred
40
2
50000
Smith
Sid
40
3
75000
Lee
Tom
30
3
60000
Yu
Robert
50
1
45000
Yu
Ted
30
6
80000
Non-Standardized and/or Multi-Element Fields
In Exhibit 27-5:
• Do all these people work for the same company? If there were 5,000
records to look at instead of just five, would you be able to identify the
variations? Company names have not been standardized, and this is
just a flavor of the possible result.
• In the
field there is an even worse lack of standards.
Some titles are spelled out in full (“Vice President”), others are abbre-
viated (“Sr V.P.”) Some names are accompanied by designations
(“Mr.”), others aren't. And do we include the department or division
(“I.S.”), or don't we?
• The positioning of the information in the
Name and Title
field is also in-
consistent, with some last names first, some first names first, one title
(marketing representative) preceding the name while the others fol-
low the name, and so on.
• In fact, there are several individual elements contained within the
Name and Title
field, which is a large part of the problem. These ele-
ments include the First Name, Last Name, Initial (if any), Designation
(e.g., Mr., Dr.), Title, the Department (e.g., I.S., Operations), and even in
one case Degrees (B.Comm.)
• The individual elements within
Name and Title
are almost impossible
to work with as they are now. Even a simple alphabetical report sorted
by last name could be impractical. Clearly, separate fields for separate
elements makes life much easier.
Name and Title
Search WWH ::




Custom Search