Graphics Programs Reference
In-Depth Information
Waveform Resolution and Ambiguity
173
where is the difference in delay between the two returns. One can assume
that the reference time is , and thus without any loss of generality one may
set . It follows that the two targets are distinguishable by how large or
small the delay
τ
τ 0
τ 0
=
0
can be.
τ
In order to measure the difference in range between the two targets consider
the integral square error between
ε 2
and
. Denoting this error as
,
ψ ()
ψ t
(
–
τ
)
it follows that
ε 2
2
=
ψ () ψ t
–
(
–
τ
)
d
(3.123)
–
Eq. (3.123) can be written as
ε 2
ψ () 2
) 2
=
d
+
ψ t
(
–
τ
d
–
(3.124)
–
–
ψ ()ψ t
) ()ψ t
{
(
(
–
τ
+
(
–
τ
)
)
d
}
–
Using Eq. (3.118) into Eq. (3.124) yields
ε 2
u () 2
ψ ()ψ t
=
2
d
–
2 Re
(
–
τ
)
d
=
(3.125)
–
–
–
j ω 0 τ
u () 2
u () ut τ
2
d
–
2 Re e
(
–
)
d
The first term in the right hand side of Eq. (3.125) represents the signal energy,
and is assumed to be constant. The second term is a varying function of with
its fluctuation tied to the carrier frequency. The integral inside the right-most
side of this equation is defined as the Ðrange ambiguity function,Ñ
τ
u () ut τ
χ R
()
=
(
–
)
d
(3.126)
–
The maximum value of is at . Target resolvability in range is
measured by the squared magnitude . It follows that if
for some nonzero value of , then the two targets are indistin-
guishable. Alternatively, if for some nonzero value of , then
the two targets may be distinguishable (resolvable). As a consequence, the
most desirable shape for
χ R
()
τ
=
0
() 2
χ R
χ R
() χ R
=
()
τ
χ R
() χ R
()
τ
is a very sharp peak (thumb tack shape) cen-
χ R
()
tered at
and falling very quickly away from the peak.
τ
=
0
Search WWH ::




Custom Search