Graphics Programs Reference
In-Depth Information
c
2 n f
R
=
------------
(3.65)
Range ambiguity associated with a SFW can be determined by examining
the phase term that corresponds to a point scatterer located at range
. More
R 0
precisely,
2 R 0
c
---------
ψ i
() 2π f i
=
(3.66)
It follows that
f i
------------------------------- R 0
c
(
–
f i
)
R 0
c
∆ψ
f
+
1
------
--------
=
=
-------------
(3.67)
(
f i
–
f i
)
+
1
or equivalently,
∆ψ
f
c
R 0
=
--------
------
(3.68)
It is clear from Eq. (3.68) that range ambiguity exists for
.
∆ψ
=
∆ψ 2 n π
+
Therefore,
∆ψ 2 n π
+
f
c
c
2∆ f
------------------------
------
---------
R 0
=
=
R 0
+
n
(3.69)
and the unambiguous range window is
c
2∆ f
R u
=
---------
(3.70)
Hence, a range profile synthesized using a particular SFW represents the rel-
ative range reflectivity for all scatterers within the unambiguous range win-
dow, with respect to the absolute range that corresponds to the burst time delay.
Additionally, if a specific target extent is larger than , then all scatterers fall-
ing outside the unambiguous range window will fold over and appear in the
synthesized profile. This fold-over problem is identical to the spectral fold-
over that occurs when using a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to resolve certain
signal frequency contents. For example, consider an FFT with frequency reso-
lution , and size . In this case, this FFT can resolve
frequency tones between and . When this FFT is used to
resolve the frequency content of a sine-wave tone equal to , fold-over
occurs and a spectral line at the fourth FFT bin (i.e., ) appears. There-
fore, in order to avoid fold-over in the synthesized range profile, the frequency
step
R u
f
=
50 Hz
NFFT
=
64
–
1600 Hz
1600 Hz
1800 Hz
200 Hz
f
must be
Search WWH ::




Custom Search