Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
SUMMARY
There are many benefits as well as challenges associated with any project delivery system,
including DB. The most notable benefits of DB compared to the more traditional DBB
project delivery method are a single point of responsibility, increased opportunity for
innovation, schedule reduction, and cost savings. There are also several challenges with
implementing DB, especially for owners who are using DB for the first time. Some of the
challenges associated with DB are related to project planning, selecting a design-builder,
and project execution. Later chapters, however, provide more detail on how best to plan
for a DB project, select a design-builder, and execute a successful project.
REFERENCES
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 1992. Design-Build in the Federal Sector.
Report of the Task Committee on Design-Build. Washington, D.C.: American Society of
Civil Engineers.
Associated General Contractors (AGC) of America. 2004. Project Delivery Systems for
Construction. Arlington, Va.: Associated General Contractors of America.
Beard, J. L., M. C. Loulakis, and E. C. Wundram. 2001. Design Build: Planning Through
Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bennett, J., E. Pothecary, and G. Robinson. 1996. The Industry Today: Designing and Build-
ing a World Class Industry. United Kingdom: Centre for Strategic Studies in Construction.
Bogus, S. M., J. Shane, and K. R. Molenaar. 2009. Independent Comparative Evaluation of
Design‐Build v. Conventional Design‐Bid‐Build Project Delivery for Municipal Water and
Wastewater Facilities. Report prepared for the Water Design-Build Council, Washing-
ton, D.C.
Federal Construction Council. 1993. Experiences of Federal Agencies With the Design-
Build Approach to Construction. Tech. Rep. 122, Consulting Com. on Cost Accounting.
Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2006. Design-Build Effectiveness Study. As
Required by TEA-21 Section 1307(f). Final Report Prepared for: USDOT—Federal
Highway Administration. January.
Gransberg, D. D., J. E. Loch, and K. R. Molenaar. 2006. Preparing for Design-Build Proj-
ects: A Primer for Owners, Engineers, and Contractors. Washington, D.C.: American
Society of Civil Engineers.
Konchar, M., and V. Sanvido. 1998. Comparison of US Project Delivery Systems. Journal
of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(6):435-444 (December).
Levy, S. M. 2006. Design-Build Project Delivery. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Molenaar, K. R., S. M. Bogus, and J. M. Priestley. 2004. Design/Build for Water/Waste-
water Facilities: State of the Industry Survey and Three Case Studies. Journal of Manage-
ment in Engineering, 20(1)( Ja nuar y).
Molenaar, K. R., and A. D. Songer. 1998. Model for Public Sector Design-Build Project
Selection. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(6):467- 479.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search