Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
=
Proof To show this we must prove that F
F [ 10 ]. Let Q 0 be an element of F .
{ Q k } k = 1 in F such that
Then there is a sequence
Q k
Q 0
0as k
ₒ∞
Assume that Q 0 (
t
)<
0 in some interval I
(
0
,
T
)
of positive measure
|
I
| >
0.
Then
T
2
2
2
Q 0 dt
Q k
Q 0
=
(
Q k
Q 0 )
dt
I (
Q k
Q 0 )
dt
=
l
>
0
0
I
Q k } k = 1 in H , and hence,
The last inequality contradicts the convergence of sequence
{
(
,
)
Q 0 is a non-negative function in
.
On the other hand, applying the Schwarz inequality we get
0
T
dt =
dt
T
T
c 1
Q 0 g 1 (
r 1 ,
t
)
(
Q k
Q 0 )
g 1 (
r 1 ,
t
)
0
0
Q k
Q 0
g 1 (
r 1 ,
t
)
0as k
ₒ∞
and therefore 0
Q 0 g 1 (
r 1 ,
t
)
dt
=
c 1 , that is Q 0
F . The lemma is proved.
does not belong to the feasible
set F . Indeed, the constraint ( 2.51 ) is not satisfied for such function because c 1 >
Note that the zero function q
(
t
)
0
,
0
t
T
,
0.
This remark allows us to establish the most important result of this section.
Theorem 2.2 The variational problem ( 2.50 ) - ( 2.52 ) has non-trivial unique solution
in the space H .
Proof By Lemma 2.1 , the space H is a uniformly convex Banach space. Besides,
by Lemmas 2.1 , 2.2 and 2.3 , the feasibility space F is a non-empty closed convex
set in H . Therefore, due to Theorem 2.1 , there is a unique function Q
F that
minimizes the distance between the set F and the point q
0. That is according to
( 2.50 ), function Q minimizes the objective functional m
(
Q
)
. Finally, we observe
that Q =
F , and hence, the unique solution of problem ( 2.50 )-( 2.52 )
is non-trivial. The theorem is proved.
0 because q
It is shown in the next section that function Q , mentioned in Theorem 2.2 ,is
precisely the function ( 2.55 ).
2.6.1.2 Optimal Discharge Parameters and the Adjoint Functions
The analytical expression for the optimal discharge rate Q , namely, the solution
of variational problem ( 2.50 )-( 2.52 ), can be obtained by means of the method of
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search