Gayborhoods: Economic Development and the Concentration of Same-Sex Couples in Neighborhoods Within Large American Cities - Regional Science Matters - page 402

Prop city total
HHs 2000

0.2822 0.3706 1.0906 0.3235 0.0159 1.0788 0.0242 -0.0638 1.1574 0.6452 1.4242 1.1649 0.4791 0.5844 1.0378

(2.89) (3.14) (82.95) (1.51) (0.06) (28.80) ( 0.10) ( 0.22) (35.11) (2.31) (4.24) (43.42) ( 2.51) (2.82) (74.87)

Prop city
black
population
2000

0.0754 0.0312 0.0269 0.0185 0.1384 0.0076 0.0906 0.0007 0.0295 0.1024 0.3750 0.0574 0.0759 0.2763 0.0426

( 4.68) ( 1.61) ( 11.18) ( 1.01) (6.21) (2.27) ( 2.67) (0.02) ( 5.30) ( 2.15) ( 6.55) ( 12.00) ( 1.98) ( 6.61) ( 13.97)

Prop city
Hispanic
population
2000

0.0119 0.0345 0.0097 0.0533 0.0714 0.0177 0.0146 0.0377 0.0142 0.0073 0.0795 0.0056 0.0272 0.0797 0.0038

( 0.81) ( 1.93) ( 4.80) ( 1.53) (1.69) ( 2.84) ( 0.42) ( 0.88) ( 2.95) (0.26) ( 2.34) ( 2.03) ( 1.06) ( 2.84) ( 1.93)

Ratio tract
med income/
city med
income

0.0006 0.0001 0.0002 0.0001 0.0002 0.0001 0.0007 0.0002 0.0002 0.0016 0.0011 0.0002 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000

(3.34) (0.65) (8.41) (0.36) (0.58) (1.68) (1.39) (0.33) (3.30) (3.08) ( 1.77) (4.74) ( 0.29) ( 0.12) (2.63)

Spatial lag
(Prop gay
male HHs
2009)

0.0055 - - 0.1539 - - 0.0619 - - 0.0421 - - 0.0649 - -

( 0.39) (5.68) ( 2.17) ( 1.41) (2.62)

Spatial lag
(Prop lesbian
HHs 2009)

- 0.0756 - - 0.0578 - - 0.1314 - - 0.0406 - - 0.0442 -

( 1.29) (5.07) (1.82) (4.30) (1.65)

Lambda
(spatial error
coefficient)

- - 0.4657 - - 0.1525 - - 0.5536 - - 0.3099 - - 0.3805

(38.91) (4.74) (24.82) (11.09) (16.29)

City dummies Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Pseudo R 2

0.384 0.180 0.943 0.537 0.264 0.926 0.401 0.113 0.919 0.286 0.168 0.952 0.393 0.233 0.983

N 10,450 10,450 10,450 2,290 2,290 2,290 2,444 2,444 2,444 2,524 2,524 2,524 3,192 3,192 3,192

z-score for each coefficient listed in parenthesis