Graphics Programs Reference
In-Depth Information
which gives
D 1 D 1 L 21 D 1 L 31
···
D 1 L n 1
0
D 2
D 2 L 32
···
D 2 L n 2
0
0
D 3
···
D 3 L 3 n
U
=
(2.24)
.
.
.
.
. . .
0
0
0
···
D n
We see that during decomposition of a symmetricmatrix only U hastobe stored,since
D and L can beeasilyrecovered from U . ThusGauss elimination, which results in an
upper triangular matrix of the form shown in Eq. (2.24), issufficienttodecompose a
symmetric matrix.
There is an alternative storage schemethatcan beemployed during LU decom-
position. The ideaistoarrive at the matrix
D 1
L 21
L 31
···
L n 1
0
D 2
L 32
···
L n 2
00 D 3
···
L n 3
U =
(2.25)
.
.
.
.
. . .
00 0
···
D n
Here U can be recovered from U i j =
D i L ji . It turnsoutthatthis schemeleadstoa
computationallymoreefficient solutionphase; therefore, we adopt itfor symmetric,
bandedmatrices.
Symmetric, Pentadiagonal Coefficient Matrix
Weencounterpentadiagonal(bandwidth
5) coefficient matrices in the solution of
fourth-order,ordinarydifferentialequationsbyfinitedifferences. Oftenthesematrices
aresymmetric, in which case an n
=
×
n matrix has the form
d 1
e 1
f 1
0
0
0
···
0
e 1
d 2
e 2
f 2
0
0
···
0
f 1
e 2
d 3
e 3
f 3
0
···
0
0
f 2
e 3
d 4
e 4
f 4
···
0
=
A
(2.26)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . .
0
···
0
f n 4
e n 3 d n 2
e n 2
f n 2
0
···
00 f n 3
e n 2 d n 1
e n 1
0
···
00 0 f n 2
e n 1
d n
Search WWH ::




Custom Search