Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
(
)
Proof.
a
Since
T
t = 0 F N , t ( 0 ) < 1 ,
1
=
0
Lemma 4.1 gives
F N , 0 (
I
(
1
)=
F N , 0
(
I
(
0
))
0
)
I
(
0
) .
Thus,
F N , 1 (
F N , 1 (
F N , 0 (
(
)=
(
(
))
)
(
)
)
)
(
)
I
2
F N , 1
I
1
0
I
1
0
0
I
0
and inductively
t 1
t = 0 F N , t ( 0 )
I
j 1
t = 0 F N , t ( 0 )
I
) ( 0 ) t / T
I
(
t
)
(
0
max
j ∈{ 1 , 2 ,···, T 1 }
(
0
) .
Since the sequence
{
I
(
t
) }
is dominated by the decreasing sequence
j 1
t = 0 F N , t ( 0 )
I
( 0 ) t / T
max
(
0
)
,
j
∈{
1
,
2
,···,
T
1
}
it converges to zero. Hence lim t I
0. The proof of Theorem 4.1 (b) is
similar to that of Theorem 4.6 in [ 18 ] and is omitted.
(
t
)=
In Model ( 5 ), the demographic dynamics does not drive the disease dynamics.
Now, we use constant recruitment and Theorem 4.1 in Example 4.1 to illustrate
an infective population on a 2-cycle attractor, where the demographic dynamics is
noncyclic.
Example 4.1. In Model ( 5 ), let
β t I
N
k
(
1
γ )
γ
e β t N
f
(
N
)=
and
φ
=
,
where
t
k
=
5
, β t =
a
+
b
× (
1
+(
1
)
) ,
a
=
0
.
1
,
b
[
42
,
50
] , γ =
0
.
1and
σ =
0
.
01.
5, the
interaction between susceptible and infected is modeled as a Poisson process, and
disease transmission is 2
In Example 4.1 , the total population is asymptotically constant, N =
periodic (
β t + 2 = β t ). When b
=
42, then
β 0 =
84
.
1,
β 1 =
0
.
1,
0 =
0
.
927
<
1 and the disease goes extinct (Theorem 4.1 and Fig. 1 ).
However, when b
1 and the infective population
persists on a positive 2-cycle attractor (Theorem 4.1 and Fig. 1 ). That is, increasing
the periodic infection rate in Example 4.1 shifts the system from disease extinction
phase to disease persistence on a 2-cycle attractor, where the total population
persists on a fixed point attractor.
=
45
.
38 then
0 =
1
.
000 1
>
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search