Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
the practice of which is even younger. As with the development of any therapy,
questions relating to which gene to target, or what combination of therapies
can be used (immunotherapy plus gene therapies) is important. A recent paper
reviewed the importance of pairing high-throughput experimental studies together
with computational systems biology studies to help determine the optimal answers
to these questions [ 23 ]. Excitingly, these types of studies can lead to personalized
medical treatment, which one would expect from medicine in the twenty first
century.
In this work, we begin by offering a small step in using mathematical models to
make predictions that could be useful to experimentalists and clinicians working in
the area of tumor-immune interactions and the development of treatment protocols.
To this end, we simplified an existing model describing tumor-immune dynamics [ 7 ]
by merging the effector molecule equation (for IL-2) into the effector cell equation,
and allowing for time-varying inputs representing several options for immunother-
apy and gene therapy. Sufficient global stability conditions of the cancer-free state
were derived and tested numerically. Since the conditions are sufficient, further
numerical analysis was performed to investigate regions of the parameter space
where the system clears the cancer, even when sufficient conditions are not satisfied.
Our results suggest that the source term of TIL cells, s 1 , in combination with the
cancer clearance term, a , provide the optimal treatment combination: high levels
of both will clear the tumor. Further investigation is necessary to establish whether
this is a viable immunotherapy/gene therapy option in the clinical setting. We are
working now on deriving necessary conditions for the stability of the cancer-free
state for the model system ( 5 ) in the general time-dependent therapy case.
References
1. Adam, J.A., Bellomo, N.: A Survey of Models for tumor-immune system dynamics, Birkhauser
Series on Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Birkhauser,
Boston (1997)
2. Aguda, B.D., Kim, Y., Piper-Hunter, M.G., Friedman, A., Marsh, C.: MicroRNA regulation of
a cancer network: Consequences of the feedback loops involving miR-17-92, E2F and Myc.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 , 19678-19683 (2008)
3. Ambrosi, D., Bellomo, N., Preziosi, L.: Modelling tumor progression, heterogeneity, and
immune competition. J. Theor. Med. 4 , 51-65 (2002)
4. Andasari, V., Gerisch, A., Lolas, G., South, A.P., Chaplain, M.A.: Mathematical modeling of
cancer cell invasion of tissue: Biological insight from mathematical analysis and computational
simulation. J. Math. Biol. 63 (1), 141-71 (2011)
5. Arciero, J., Jackson, T., Kirschner, D.: A mathematical model of tumor- immune evasion and
siRNA treatment. Discrete Continuous Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 4 , 39-58 (2004)
6. Arlotti, L., Gamba, A., Lachowicz, M.: A kinetic model of tumor/immune system cellular
interactions. J. Theor. Med. 4 , 39-50 (2002)
7. Banerjee, S., Immunotherapy with Interleukin-2: A Study Based on Mathematical Modeling,
Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 18 (3), 389-398 (2008)
8. Bellomo, N., Delitala, M.: From the mathematical kinetic, and stochastic game theory to
modelling mutations, onset, progression and immune competition of cancer cells. Phys. Life
Rev. 5 , 183-206 (2008)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search