Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
w T Pw
U 1
b
T U b [
U b U b ] 1 U b U 1
(
k
1
)
=(
k
1
)(
[
u
u b ])
[
u
u b ]
(51)
b
U 1
b
T U 1
b
=(
k
1
)(
[
u
u b ])
[
u
u b ]
(52)
T
U 1
b
T U 1
b
=(
)[
u b
]
(
)
[
u b
]
k
1
u
u
(53)
T
T
] 1
=(
k
1
)[
u
u b ]
([
U b (
U b )
)[
u
u b ]
(54)
T
P b ) 1
=[
u
u b ]
(
[
u
u b ] .
(55)
Combining Eqs. ( 50 )and( 55 )inEq.( 48 ) we deduce that
J
w T
(
w
)=(
k
1
)
(
I
P
)
w
+
J
(
u b +
U b w
) .
(56)
The first term on the right is the orthogonal projection of w onto the null space, N ,
of U b ; thus, it depends only on the components of w in the null space. Similarly
the second term only depends on the components in the column space, S ,of U b .It
follows that w a minimizes J if and only if it is orthogonal to N and u a minimizes J .
Analysis Mean and Covariance
We now proceed to derive the updated analysis and covariance matrix by computing
an approximate minimizer to J based on the Kalman filter equations. The results are
the analogue of Eqs. ( 40 )and( 41 ). To do so we first obtain the linear approximation
of the observation operator. This is accomplished by first applying H to each
background trajectory, u b ( i ) . This produces the
-dimensional (
m ) vectors that
comprise the background observation ensemble
y b ( i ) =
u b ( i ) ) .
(
H
(57)
Here
denotes the spatial dimension of the OBSERVATIONS. Denote y b as the
mean background observation and Y b the
k background observation ensemble
perturbation matrix whose i th column is y b ( i )
×
y b . We then take the linear
approximation
H
(
u b +
U b w
)
y b +
Y b w
.
(58)
Replacing H with the above and using the assumption that the background mean
w b =
0, the analysis mean satisfies the analogue of Eq. ( 25 ):
y o
w a =
K
[
y b
Y b w
] .
(59)
Applying Eqs. ( 40 )and( 41 ) with Y b playing the role of H produces
P a Y b R 1
y o
w a =
(
y b ) ,
(60)
P a =[(
Y b R 1 Y b ] 1
k
1
)
I
+
.
(61)
In model variables the analysis mean and covariance matrix are determined by
Search WWH ::




Custom Search