Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 3
Parameters of GA
GA property
Value/method
Population size
80
Fitness function
MSE
Selection method
Geometric selection
Crossover method
Arithmetic
Number of crossover points
3
Mutation method
Uniform mutation
Mutation probability
0.01
Fig. 5 Position control using
genetic algorithm
Fig. 6 Comparison of GA
and ZN technique
Analysis of Result
All the conventional methods of controller tuning lead to a large settling time,
overshoot, rise time, and steady-state error of the controlled system. Hence a soft
computing techniques are introduced into the control loop. GA-based tuning
methods have proved their excellence in giving better results by improving the
steady-state characteristics and performance indices (Fig. 6 , Table 4 ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search