A Performance-Centric Comparative Study of Hybrid Security Protocol Architectures - Proceedings of All India Seminar on Biomedical Engineering 2012 (AISOBE-2012) - page 227

Table 1 A performance
matrix based on execution
time

Execution time (ms)

Processor Recent architecture Proposed architecture

Pentium 4 15,170 14,504

Dual core 9,876 9,408

Core 2 duo 8,660 8,142

i3 2,865 2,448

i5 2,504 2,308

Chart 1 A performance-
based chart

20000

15000

RECENT
ARCHITECTURE

10000

5000

PROPOSED
ARCHITECTURE

0

Performance Evaluation

In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed architecture, we first
implement both the security protocol architecture's using Java 1.6 and then
execute both architecture implementation codes over a number of hardware plat-
form (processors) under ideal conditions. The common data set given as an input
to both the architecture implementation in order to get the most accurate execution
time as possible.
Table 1 contains the average execution time of both the architecture implementation.
The average execution time is obtained by first making 1,000 hits to the security
architecture implementation and then by dividing the total execution time we get faster
the execution of architecture implementation by 1,000. The same methodology adopted
in the software companies in order to know the performance of the code (Chart 1 ).
However, the selection of the programming language for implementing both the
security protocol architecture is obvious Java programming language because of
two simple reasons:

1. Java is platform-independent language, i.e., we can develop the code of the
proposed architecture in it and then makes it run on any platform. The devel-
oped code will be platform independent which in turn increases the domain of
its application in a variety of fields such as use of proposed hybrid security
protocol in Mobile Adhoc network (MANET) also apart from E-commerce and
M-commerce transactions [ 12 ].