Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
TableĀ 7.9
Means.and.Standard.Deviations.of.the.Spread.for.Scenario.b:.50.Users
TestingSet
MOGA
NPGA2
NSGA2
SPEA2
JG
1
0.96062
0.96917
0.96843
0.97096
0.96003
(0.03261)
(0.02618)
(0.02822)
(0.02906)
(0.02876)
2
0.95888
0.96347
0.96531
0.96491
0.97416
(0.03379)
(0.03510)
(0.03890)
(0.04128)
(0.062043)
3
0.95964
0.96828
0.97048
0.96120
0.95817
(0.03512)
(0.02732)
(0.03533)
(0.04391)
(0.04916)
4
0.95982
0.96202
0.96421
0.96377
0.94788
(0.03662)
(0.04374)
(0.05022)
(0.04380)
(0.05851)
5
0.95541
0.96625
0.96334
0.95894
0.96291
(0.03169)
(0.03527)
(0.02834)
(0.04291)
(0.03669)
6
0.95817
0.96369
0.96771
0.95566
0.95168
(0.04278)
(0.03486)
(0.03583)
(0.03866)
(0.05337)
7
0.97214
0.98094
0.97076
0.97222
0.97002
(0.02222)
(0.02363)
(0.02729)
(0.02588)
(0.03060)
8
0.95921
0.96735
0.97458
0.96891
0.96095
(0.03750)
(0.02611)
(0.02456)
(0.02443)
(0.03080)
9
0.96348
0.96340
0.96429
0.96015
0.95274
(0.03106)
(0.03829)
(0.03538)
(0.03922)
(0.04628)
10
0.95928
0.96656
0.97195
0.95944
0.96126
(0.03114)
(0.02769)
(0.03023)
(0.03351)
(0.03570)
Note: The. best. result. for. each. testing. set. is. marked. in. bold,. and. the. values. in.
parentheses.represent.the.standard.deviation.
.
2..
As.compared.with.the.NPGA2,.the.JG.was.more.favorable,.except.
for.sets.5.and.6.
.
3.. As.compared.with.the.NSGA2,.the.JG.was.more.favorable.for.all.
10.sets.
.
4.. As.compared.with.the.SPEA2,.the.JG.was.more.favorable,.except.
for.sets.5,.6,.and.10.
Scenario.b:.50.users
.
1..
As.compared.with.the.MOGA,.the.JG.was.more.favorable,.except.
for.set.5.
.
2..
As.compared.with.the.NPGA2,.the.JG.was.more.favorable,.except.
for.sets.5-7.
.
3..
As.compared.with.the.NSGA2,.the.JG.was.more.favorable,.except.
for.set.1.
.
4..
As.compared.with.the.SPEA2,.the.JG.was.more.favorable,.except.
for.set.5.
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search