Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
porous UME can be calculated as the sum of the responses
I
D
, and
I
T
, of the microdisk
electrode and the thin-layer device. Thus, the measured current using the porous UME
can be described by
K
D
v
1/2
I
I
D
I
T
K
T
v
∆
E
P(D)
∆
E
P
∆
E
P(T)
(3)
where
1
2
⎛
⎝
⎞
⎠
⎡
⎤
nF
Dv
RT
π
nF
RT
⎟
3
2
⎜
1
2
⎢⎢
⎢
⎥
I
()
Ac
º
(
EE
)
Kv
D
i
D
⎣
⎦
(4)
∆
E
59
/n mV
P(D)
22
′
nFvVc
RT
º
exp[(
nF RT
/
(
E
E
º
]
I
Kv
T
T
′
{
1
exp[(
nF
/
RT E
(
E
º
)]}
2
(5)
∆
E
0
P(T)
where
E
0
is the formal potential of the redox couple,
E
i
is the initial scanning potential,
∆
E
P(T)
are the differences between the anodic and cathodic peak potentials
for the disk and the thin-layer device, respectively,
E
P(D)
and
∆
(
E
) is the normalized dimension-
less current function for a sweep experiment with a reversible system,
K
D
and
K
T
are
constants independent of the scan rate,
A
is the surface area of the disk electrode,
v
is
the scan rate, and
V
is the volume of electrolyte within the porous matrix of the porous
UME. It is possible to achieve a signifi cantly enhanced electrode surface and homoge-
neous polarization simultaneously at a porous UME if the porous layer is under 50
χ
m.
Improved reversibility, a better developed limiting diffusion current and easier analysis
of experimental data should render the porous UME applicable in many areas of elec-
troanalytical chemistry and electrode kinetics studies in terms of Eqs (1)-(5).
The effects of the array pattern on UME current output of different packing densi-
ties have been studied by using steady-state and chronoamperometric responses [107].
When the interelectrode distance
d
µ
2
r
, the array was considered loosely packed
and Eqs (1)-(5) can be applied. When
d
2
r
, the array was considered densely packed
and more closely resembled the behavior from an UME of a similar surface area to a
large electrode. The implication is that only when
d
is large enough, the advantages of
using an array pattern can be achieved. The convection-dependent contribution to UME
array is also affected by the interelectrode distance. It was suggested that the theoretical
current response is in agreement with the experimental data when
d
10
r
[107, 108].
11.4.2 Fabrication technologies
11.4.2.1 Overview
Since the late 1970s, electroanalytical array sensors have been constructed by meth-
ods similar to the well-established semiconductor fabrication processes, which use
Search WWH ::
Custom Search