Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
References
1. Apfelbaum H, Pelah A, Peli E (2007) Heading assessment by “tunnel vision” patients and
control subjects standing or walking in a virtual environment. ACM Trans Appl Percept
4:1-16
2. Bank PJM, Roerdink M, Peper CE (2011) Comparing the efficacy of metronome beeps and
stepping stones to adjust gait: steps to follow. Exp Brain Res 209:159-169
3. Bardy BG, WarrenWH, Kay BA (1996) Motion parallax is used to control postural sway during
walking. Exp Brain Res 11:271-282
4. Blin O, Ferrandez A, Serratrice G (1990) Quantitative analysis of gait in Parkinson patients:
increased variability of stride length. J Neurol Sci 98:79-91
5. Bliss JP, Tidwell PD, Guest MA (1997) The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering
spatial navigation training to firefighters. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 6:73-86
6. Bloem BR, Hausdorff JM, Visser JE, Giladi N (2004) Falls and freezing of gait in Parkinson's
disease: a review of two interconnected, episodic phenomena. Mov Disord 19:871-884
7. Brooks B, McNeil JE, Rose FD (1999) Route learning in a case of amnesia: a preliminary
investigation into the efficacy of training in a virtual environment. Neuropsychol Rehabil
9:63-76
8. Burdea GC (2003) Virtual
rehabilitation—benefits and challenges. Methods Inf Med
42:519-523
9. Deutsch JE, Mirelman A (2007) Virtual reality-based approaches to enable walking for people
poststroke. Topics Stroke Rehabil 14:45-53
10. Emmett A (1994) Virtual reality helps steady the gait of Parkinson's patients. Comput Graph
World 17:17-18
11. Fung J, Richards CL, Malouin F, McFadyen BJ, Lamontagne A (2006) A treadmill and motion
coupled virtual reality system for gait training post-stroke. CyberPsychol Behav 9:157-162
12. Gerin-Lajoie M, Ciombor DM, Warren WH, Aaron RK (2010) Using ambulatory virtual envi-
ronments for the assessment of functional gait impairment: a proof-of-concept study. Gait
Posture 31:533-536
13. Geruschat DR, Turano KA, Stahl JW (1998) Traditional measures of mobility performance
and retinitis pigmentosa. Optom Vis Sci 75:525-537
14. Gibson JJ (1950) The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
15. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
16. Glass L, Mackey MC (1979) Pathological conditions resulting from instabilities in physiolog-
ical control systems. Ann N Y Acad Sci 316:214-235
17. Gobbetti E, Scatenis R (1998) Virtual reality: past, present and future. In: Riva G, Wiederhold
BK, Molinari E (eds) Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience. Ios Press,
Amsterdam, pp 1-18
18. Goldberg S (1994) Training dismounted soldiers in a distributed interactive virtual environment.
U.S. Army Res Inst Newslett 14:9-12
19. Grabiner PC, Biswas ST, Grabiner MD (2001) Age-related changes in spatial and temporal
gait variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:31-35
20. Hausdorff JM (2007) Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: Finding meaning in the stride-to-stride
fluctuations of human walking. Hum Mov Sci 26:555-589
21. Hausdorff JM, Peng C-K, Ladin Z, Wei JY, Goldberger AL (1995) Is walking a random
walk? Evidence for long-range correlations in stride interval of human gait. Model Physiol
78:349-358
22. Haymes S, Guest DM, Heyes A, JohnstonA (1996)Mobility of people with retinitis pigmentosa
as a function of vision and psychological variables. Optom Vis Sci 73:621-637
23. Hove MJ, Spivey MJ, Krumhansl CL (2010) Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor
synchronization. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 36:1525-1534
24. Jaffe DL, Brown DA, Pierson-Carey CD, Buckley EL, Lew HL (2004) Stepping over obstacles
to improve walking in individuals with poststroke hemiplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev 41:283-292
