Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
G '
η
G
G eq
Gelation time
Gelation time
Time
Time
(a) Time growth of equilibrium gel modulus. G eq rises very rapidly, even on a log scale, at or
just after the gelation time, before reaching a final asymptotic level. (b) Because of the finite
frequency effect and the contribution of non-ideal network assembly contributions, both G 0 and G 00
will tend to rise before the true gelation point.
Figure 2.18
commonly for frequencies greater than, say, 30 rad s 1 . The measuring strain may also
have to be a compromise so suf
cient signal can be detected pre-gel, but with sensitive
modern instruments this is less of a problem.
Gelation time measurement
There are a number of approaches to the determination of, say, gelation time, but
rst we
consider the expected self-assembly time pro
le. For the equilibrium gel modulus, the ideal
pro
le is shown in Figure 2.18a . Initially there is no response, but then G eq rises very
rapidly, even on a log scale, at or just after the gelation time, before reaching a
final
asymptotic level. Such behaviour is a simple consequence of the positive-order kinetics of
self-assembly (cross-linking) and the requirement of a minimum number of cross-links per
'
at the gel point. We note that some phenomenological models have neglected the
pre-gel behaviour and simply
chain
'
tted the G eq (>0) versus t behaviour to an n-order kinetic
model. From the data-
tting viewpoint this is quite acceptable, provided it is appreciated
that the underlying physics of self-assembly has been perverted.
The above scenario is, of course, complicated by the consideration that what is being
evaluated by the instrument is not G eq but G 0 and G 00 . Both of these are
finite even for a
solution, although the respective moduli values may be very low. However, because of
the
finite frequency effect and the contribution of non-ideal network assembly contribu-
tions, both G 0 and G 00 will tend to rise before the true gelation point, and something akin
to Figure 2.18b is usually seen. The
flattening off of G 00 is not something predicted from
-
indeed some would expect a pronounced maximum in G 00 after gelation
-
theory
but
this is rarely observed for physical gels, except for some low-concentration gelatin
systems. This asymptotic level G 00 behaviour has been associated with the
'
stiffness
'
of
Search WWH ::




Custom Search