Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
of fluid networks. Each network has its own individual porosity n a , density ρ a ,
permeability k a and finally fluid velocity relative to the aforementioned solid matrix
w i /n a .
The complete system presents a highly non-linear set of equations which require
vast computational effort. Fortunately, we are dealing with biological flows and so
acceleration frequencies can be neglected and this can simplify the system to a con-
cise set of A +
1 equations, i.e.
+ ρ b
A
2 u
∂t 2
σ
α a
p a
∇·
=
0 ,
(22.1)
a
=
1
k a ρ a b
p a
A
∂p a
∂t +
2 u
∂t 2
1
Q a
α a ∂(
∇·
u )
∂t +∇·
k a
a ˙
s b a =
0 .
b
=
1 ,b
=
(22.2)
Here, σ is the effective stress in the solid matrix, b is the local body force, u is
the displacement vector of the solid matrix, ρ
= a = 1 n a p a
+
ρ s ( 1
n) is the
= a = 1 n a is the total porosity of the combined fluid
networks, ρ s is the density of the solid, k is the isotropic permeability, Q is the
combined compressibility of the system, ∂(
total density of the system, n
ε isthestrainrateinthe
solid matrix, α a is the Biot parameter of the defined network a and finally
∇·
u )/∂t
= ˙
˙
s b a is
the rate of fluid exchange from network b to a (Tully and Ventikos, 2011 ).
The MPET framework strives to capture the independent nature of the fluid trans-
fer within the brain. The quadruple MPET model takes into account the arterial
blood network (a) , the arteriole/capillary network (c) , venous blood network (v)
and extracellular/CSF network (e) . To transform the system in Eqs. ( 22.1 ) and ( 22.2 )
into the quadruple MPET system required, one sets A
(a,c,v,e) . In ad-
dition to this, further simplifications are made by assuming: a linear stress-strain re-
lationship, isotropic permeability, no external forces on the system, negligible grav-
itational effects, stationary reference frame, quasi-steady system due to the large
time scales in the development of HCP and physiology-derived constraints of spe-
cific directional transfer of water between networks in order to avoid breaches in
continuity and finally a spherically symmetric geometry. This gives the following
simplified relationships for the new quadruple MPET system, i.e.
=
4 and a
=
α a ∂p a
2 u
∂r 2
α c ∂p c
α ν ∂p ν
α e ∂p e
∂r
2
r
∂u
∂r
2 u
r 2
1
2 ν
+
∂r +
∂r +
∂r +
=
0 ,
(22.3)
2 G( 1
ν)
k a 2 p a
∂r 2
∂p a
∂r
2
r
+
+|˙
s a c |=
0 ,
(22.4)
k c 2 p c
∂r 2
∂p c
∂r
2
r
+
−|˙
s a c |+|˙
s c e |+|˙
s c ν |=
0 ,
(22.5)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search