Compression Performance Analysis in HEVC - High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) - page 301

References

1. Bjøntegaard G (2001) Calculation of average PSNR differences between RD-curves, ITU-T
SG16 Q6 Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG), Document VCEG-M33, Austin, Apr. 2001
2. Bossen F (2011) Excel template for BD-rate calculation based on Piece-wise Cubic Interpola-
tion, JCT-VC Reflector
3. Bossen F (2013) Common test conditions and software reference configurations, Joint Collab-
orative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC), Document JCTVC-L1110, Geneva, Jan. 2014
4. Cover TM, Thomas JA (1991) Elements of information theory, Chapter 13. Wiley, New York
5. Flierl M, Girod B (2003) Generalized B pictures and the draft H.264/AVC video compression
standard. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 13(7):587-597
6. H.264/MPEG-4 AVC Reference Software, Joint Model 18.5: http://iphome.hhi.de/suehring/
tml/download/jm18.5.zip
7. Hanhart P, Ebrahimi T (2014) Calculation of average coding efficiency based on subjective
quality scores. J Visual Commun Image Represent 25(3):555-564
8. Hanhart P, Rerabek M, De Simone F, Ebrahimi T (2012) Subjective quality evaluation of the
upcoming HEVC video compression standard. In: Proc. SPIE. 8499, Applications of Digital
Image Processing XXXV, no. 84990V, Oct. 2012
9. Hanhart P, Rerabek M, Korshunov P, Ebrahimi T (2013) Subjective evaluation of HEVC intra
coding for still image compression. In: Seventh international workshop on Video Processing
and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics (VPQM), Scottsdale, Arizona
10. Horowitz M, Kossentini F, Mahdi N, Xu S, Guermazi H, Tmar H, Li B, Sullivan GJ, Xu J
(2012) Informal subjective quality comparison of video compression performance of the
HEVC and H.264/MPEG-4 AVC standards for low-delay applications. In: Proc. SPIE. 8499,
Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXV, no. 84990W, Oct. 2012
11. ITU-R Rec. BT.500-11 (2006) Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of
television pictures
12. ITU-T Rec. P.910 (2008) Subjective video quality assessment

methods for multimedia

applications
13. ITU-R BT.2022 (2012) General viewing conditions for subjective assessment of quality of
SDTV and HDTV television pictures on flat panel displays
14. ITU-R BT.500-13 (2012) Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of
television pictures
15. McCann K, Bross B, Han WJ, Kim IK, Sugimoto K, Sullivan GJ (2013), High Efficiency Video
Coding (HEVC) Test Model 13 (HM 13) Encoder Description, Joint Collaborative Team on
Video Coding (JCT-VC), Document JCTVC-O1002, Geneva, Oct. 2013
16. Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC
JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11. HM12.1 Reference Software: https://hevc.hhi.fraunhofer.de/svn/svn-
HEVCSoftware/(mainsite) and http://hevc.kw.bbc.co.uk/svn/jctvc-a124/(mirrorsite)
17. Karczewicz M, Ye Y, Chong I (2008) Rate distortion optimized quantization, ITU-T SG16 Q6
Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG), Document VCEG-AH21, Antalya, Jan. 2008
18. Nguyen T, Marpe D (2012) Performance analysis of HEVC based Intra coding for still image
compression. In: PCS2012, May 2012, pp 233-236
19. Ohm J-R, Sullivan GJ, Schwarz H, Tan TK, Wiegand T (2012) Comparison of the coding
efficiency of video coding standards -including High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). IEEE
Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 22(12):1669-1684
20. Ortega A, Ramchandran K (1999) Rate-distortion methods for image and video compression:
an overview. IEEE Signal Process J 23-50
21. Schwarz H, Marpe D, Wiegand T (2005) Hierarchical B pictures, Joint Video Team (JVT),
Document JVT-P014, Poznan, July 2005
22. Sullivan GJ, Wiegand T (1999) Rate-distortion optimization for video compression. IEEE
Signal Process J 74 -90
23. VideoLANx264 SW library (2013) http://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html . Version
core l35 r2345, 30 July 2013