Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
9. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-
monotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2),
321-357 (1995)
10. Edmonds, B.: How formal logic can fail to be useful for modelling or designing
mas. Online resource,
http://cfpm.org/logic-in-abss/papers/Edmonds.html
11. Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Trust and relational capital. Journal of Computa-
tional and Mathematical Organization 17(2), 179-195 (2011)
12. Falcone, R., Pezzulo, G., Castelfranchi, C., Calvi, G.: Contract nets for evaluating
agent trustworthiness. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S.K., Sabater-Mir, J., Singh, M.P.
(eds.) Trusting Agents. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3577, pp. 43-58. Springer, Heidelberg
(2005)
13. Flache, A., Macy, M.W.: Small worlds and cultural polarization. J. Math. So-
ciol. 35(1-3), 146-176 (2011)
14. Gabbriellini, S., Torroni, P.: Arguments in social networks. In: Proceedings of the
Twelfth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
(AAMAS 2013). IFAAMAS (2013)
15. Gabbriellini, S., Torroni, P.: Ms dialogues: Persuading and getting persuaded. a
model of social network debates that reconciles arguments and trust. In: Proc.
10th ArgMAS (2013)
16. Gabbriellini, S., Torroni, P.: NetArg: An agent-based social simulator with argu-
mentative agents (demonstration). In: Proc. 12th AAMAS (2013)
17. Granovetter, M.: Threshold models of collective behavior. Am. J. Sociol. 83(6),
1420-1443 (1978)
18. Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological
Theory 1, 201-233 (1983)
19. Macy, M., Skvoretz, J.: The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers:
a computational model. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63, 638-660 (1998)
20. Manzo, G.: Variables, mechanisms and simulations: can the three methods be syn-
tesized. Revue Francaise de Sociologie 48(5), 35-71 (2007)
21. Mercier, H., Sperber, D.: Why do humans reason? arguments for an argumentative
theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34(02), 57-74 (2011)
22. Palloni, A.: Theories and models of diffusion in sociology. Working Paper 11, Center
for Demography and Ecology (1998)
23. Pallotta, V., Delmonte, R.: Automatic argumentative analysis for interaction min-
ing. Argument & Computation 2(2-3), 77-106 (2011)
24. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In:
Readings in Agents. Morgan Kaufmann (1998)
25. Reich, W.: Reasoning about other agents: a plea for logic-based methods.
JASSS 7(4) (2004)
26. Skvoretz, J., Fararo, T.: Status and participation in task groups: A dynamic net-
work model. Am. J. Sociol. 101(5), 1366-1414 (1996)
27. Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social network analysis: methods and applications. CUP,
Cambridge (1999)
28. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Na-
ture 393, 440-442 (1998)
29. Wilensky, U.: Netlogo. In: cCL and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern
University, Evanston (1999)
