Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
v
j
k
q
8000
A
q
7000
k
6000
q
k
5000
q
k
4000
j
q
j
k
3000
j
q
k
j
v
v
j
2000
q
k
v
j
v
q
j
k
v
1000
j
v
q
k
v
j
v
k
q
j
v
k
q
j
v
k
q
j
v
v
0
q
v
k
j
q
v
k
j
v
k
q
j
v
k
q
j
0
5
10
15
1.000
v
q
j
v
k
q
j
k
B
v
0.934
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
j
v
k
v
v
v
0.868
q
k
j
0.802
q
k
j
k
j
k
j
q
j
k
k
j
k
j
j
k
k
j
j
q
k
j
0.736
k
j
k
j
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
q
0.670
0
5
10
15
GENERATION
Fig. 9.11
Mean (across 30 replicate runs for each set of trial conditions) population growth
(graph A) and observed heterozygosity (graph B) over generations for four different
populations. Trial populations had identical initial conditions except for the placement of the
20 founders (always with closest spacing): in two lines of 10 each in the preserve center (trial
v); in four lines (each with 5 founders) placed in each preserve corner with10 grid points being
the closest distance of any founder to a preserve border (trial j); in four lines of 5 founders each,
the lines placed in each corner with 80 grid points being the closest distance of any founder
to a preserve border (trial k); or in fi ve lines of four founders each, with four lines placed in
each corner with 80 grid points being the closest distance of any founder to a preserve border,
and the fi fth line placed at the preserve center (trial q). Symbols at the top are not to scale: the
preserve was 5,120 average density grid points on a side, creating a preserve with 26,214,400
establishment points. In graph B, means for trials j and k are not signifi cantly different.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search