Evaluation as a Field - Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics - page 46

References
1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology . Philadelphia, PA: Lippen-
cott-Raven; 1998.
2. Rossi PH, Freeman HE. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach . Newbury Park,
CA: Sage; 1989.
3. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective Evaluation . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass;
1981.
4. House ER. Evaluating with Validity . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
5. Miller PL, Sittig DF. The evaluation of clinical decision support systems: what
is necessary versus what is interesting. Med Inform 1990;15:185-190.
6. Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF. Communication of Innovations . New York: Free
Press; 1971.
7. Blum BI. Clinical Information Systems . New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
8. Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG. Broadening our approach to evaluating biomed-
ical information systems. Symp Comput Applications Med Care 1992;16:8-12.
9. Anderson JG, Aydin CE, Jay SJ, eds. Computers in Health Care: Research and
Evaluation . Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1995.
10. Sackett DL, Wennberg JE. Choosing the best research design for each question:
It's time to stop squabbling over the “best” methods. BMJ 1997;315:16-36.
11. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an intro-
spective computer medical record: a two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med
1984;100:130-138.
12. Yu VL, Fagan LM, Wraith SM, et al. Antimicrobial selection by computer: a
blinded evaluation by infectious disease experts. JAMA 1979;242:1279-1282.
13. Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Classen DC, Clemmer TP, Weaver LK, Orme JF Jr,
Lloyd JF, Burke JP. A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics
and other antiinfective agents. N Engl J Med 1998 Jan 22;338(4):232-238.
14. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Matthieu D. A critical appraisal of
research on the effects of computer-based decision support systems on clinician
performance and patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:135-142.
15. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SF, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical
decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a sys-
tematic review. JAMA 1998;280:1339-1346.
16. Turing AM. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind Q Rev Psychol Philos
1950;59:433-460.
17. Wyatt J. Lessons learned from the field trial of ACORN, an expert system to
advise on chest pain. In: Barber B, Cao D, Qin D, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth
World Conference on Medical Informatics, Singapore . Amsterdam: North

Holland; 1989:111-115.
18. De Bliek R, Friedman CP, Speedie SM, Blaschke TF, France CL. Practitioner
preferences and receptivity for patient-specific advice from therapeutic moni-
toring system. Symp Comput Applications Med Care 1988;12:225-228.
19. Scriven M. Goal free evaluation. In: House ER, ed. School Evaluation . Berke-
ley, CA: McCutchan; 1973.
20. Smith R. Using a mock trial to make a difficult clinical decision. BMJ
1992;305:284-287.
21. Eisner EW. The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of
Educational Practice . New York: Macmillan; 1991.