Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
5. Sackett DL, Wennberg JE. Choosing the best research design for each question
BMJ 1997;315:1636.
6. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D, the CONSORT Group (Consolidated Stan-
dards of Reporting Trials). The CONSORT statement: revised recommenda-
tions for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.
JAMA 2001;285(15):1987-1991.
7. Chalmers I, Altman DG, Egger M, Smith GD, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health
Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. London: BMJ Books, 2001.
8. Jones R. Why do qualitative research? BMJ 1995;311;2 [editorial].
9. Lindberg DA, Siegel ER, Rapp BA, Wallingford KT, Wilson SR. Use of
MEDLINE by physicians for clinical problem solving. JAMA 1993;269:3124-
3129.
10. Russell J, Greenhalgh T, Boynton P, Rigby M. Soft networks for bridging the
gap between research and practice: illuminative evaluation of CHAIN. BMJ
2004;328(7449):1174.
11. Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the
internet affects patients' experience of cancer:
a qualitative study.
BMJ
2004;328(7439):564.
12. Anderson R. NHS-wide networking and patient confidentiality. BMJ 1995;311:
5-6.
13. Wyatt JC. Clinical data systems. II. Components and techniques. Lancet
1994;344:1609-1614.
14. Heathfield H, Wyatt JC. The road to professionalism in medical informatics: a
proposal for debate. Methods Inf Med 1995;34:426-433.
15. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical
decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a
systematic review. JAMA 2005;293(10):1223-1238.
16. Berner ES. Ethical and legal issues in the use of clinical decision support
systems. J Healthcare Inf Manag 2002;16(4):34-37.
17. Brahams D, Wyatt J. Decision-aids and the law. Lancet 1989;2:632-634.
18. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical studies of design related
bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-1066.
Suggested Reading
Popham WJ. Educational Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1988. (An
amusing, widely applicable chapter on reporting evaluations.)
Smith NL, ed. Communication Strategies in Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage,
1982. (A somewhat old but very interesting topic that outlines many nontradi-
tional modes of communicating evaluation results is.)
Appendix A: Proposal Quality Checklist for
Authors and Referees
A. Specific aims
1. Establishes a numbering system (Aim 1, Aim 2...)
2. Includes preamble followed by a list of numbered aims
Search WWH ::
Custom Search