Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
tion of the currently used MyPyramid (Haven, Burns, Britten, and Davis 2006). Krebs-
Smith and Kris-Etherton reported the intent of MyPyramid, although not technically expli-
citly prescribed for any existing computer science and technical training event or condition
it was meant to inform the general public regarding new cognitive human development
with the required choices we can make in studying computer science and technology.
The handout was chosen for students struggling with a computational knowledge deficit
because of its general applicability that all computers can be incorporated into a network
computational process and those solutions to and malfunctioning of those computers and
the strategies to develop them further can be culturally sensitively aligned to reach the re-
quirements of the entire process. The message is unassuming in that it alludes to individual
capability and intelligence but direct with regard to balancing the logical activities of the
study. In the initial consultation, the coordinators reviewed the intention of MyPyramid and
encouraged the students to use the guideline and its online resources.
In the discussion of recommended facts and a portion or a fraction of the entire study
program to help the students, the coordinators reviewed the study fact sheet and called at-
tention to the items listed under new development. Philipson (2005) reported surveys indic-
ated 60-80 percent of students in the training institute could fluently read and understand
computer science and technology terminology and 30-40 percent admitted having trouble
reading such information. The surveys also indicated participant misunderstanding in re-
lation to how choice specialization plays a part in the reading effort and the meaning of
students' “daily self-esteem values and inspiration” to participate in the study program at
the institute (Philipson).
Students at MRU polytechnic, who were all English speakers, expressed confusion re-
garding the difficulty in computer terminologies. Students were amazed at the quick re-
sponse (to their constructive criticism) from the staff which indicates a total support for
them to learn terms like RAM and CPU. Boehl (2007) reported low computer literacy is an
obstacle causing many to ignore the study of information technology or give up on attempt-
ing smarter study choices, this means in effect that using technology can help students to
study smarter. Boehl reported 75 percent of the students in question sacrifice their money
to educate to higher levels of education. Literacy programs of such higher levels of educa-
tion can result in costing computer scholars a few thousands per year, especially in direct
good institutions of prominent computer training programs.
The information technology administration is an advocate for improving computer in-
formation systems curricula, which includes the computer network facts panel and demon-
strates commitment to developing standardized, scientifically sound, and accurate inform-
ation (Philipson 2005). The administration hopes to assist informed computer end users to
Search WWH ::
Custom Search