Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
(a) k=20.0 (b) k=10.0
(c) k=5.0 (d) k=4.0
Fig. 5. The Target Damage State in Different k Value
Table 3. Calculative Result of the Target Damage Area in Different k Value
k
20.0
10.0
5.0
4.0
Damage area
diameter
230.4
210.8
215.5
209.3
Table.3 showed that effect of the target damage area was small in different k value,
but Fig.7 showed that the target damage area shape was affected in different k value. As
the k value was equal to 4.0 and 5.0, the plastic strain of the target damage area was
rather serial, and the brim of the target damage area was rather clear [4] . As the k value
was less than 4.0, the forehead of target had obvious bulgy phenomena. So, for acquiring
better image of the target damage area, the k value ought to be equaled to less than 20.0.
3.3
Effect of Gridding to Numerical Simulation Efficiency
Table.4 showed calculative times of the computer when the depth of the armor-piercing
warhead penetration the target arriving to 50mm, in computer environment of the
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7400 2.80GHz 2.79GHz,2.0GB memory.
Table 4. Calculative Times in Different k Value
k
20.0
10.0
5.0
4.0
Calculative time
10
15
37
53
Search WWH ::




Custom Search