Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 1. Quantitative evaluation for the first data set
Standard deviation
Information entropy
Average gradient
55.4012
4.8904
0.0002767
55.6480
4.9104
0.0003714
55.3374
5.0465
0.0005607
The second data set for evaluation consists of 81 images for a bee. Six images of
them are showed in figure 5. Every image in the data set has different focus region.
The fusion results generated by three methods are shown in figure 6.
Fig. 5. Six images of the second data set
Fig. 6. Fusion results generated by different methods
Table 2 presents a quantitative comparison of various multi-focus fusion methods
for this data set. The evaluation order is figure 6(a), 6(b) and 6(c). These fusion me-
thods consists of average based method, wavelet based method and pyramid based
method in terms of standard deviation, information entropy and average gradient.
From table 2, pyramid based method has maximum values in all three columns, which
indicates that it can generate best fusion result.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search