Graphics Reference
In-Depth Information
where
u
i,j
≡
u
(
i,j
) is the approximate solution of (9) at grid point (
i,j
) with
grid size
h
= 1 as usual. Then applying the Gauss-Seidel iteration to (10) leads
to
2
μ
(
C
E
+
C
W
+
C
N
+
C
S
)+
ʽ
u
k
+1
i,j
=
2
μ
C
E
u
i,j
+1
+
C
W
u
k
+1
i−
1
,j
+
C
S
u
i
+1
,j
+
ʾI
i,j
+
ʾg
i,j
,
(11)
i,j−
1
+
C
N
u
k
+1
where
ˈ
k
)
i,j
+1
,C
W
=(1
ˈ
k
)
i,j−
1
,C
N
=(1
ˈ
k
)
i−
1
,j
,C
S
=(1
ˈ
k
)
i
+1
,j
.
C
E
=(1
−
−
−
−
And we implement the relaxation method to speed up the iteration (11) by
u
k
+1
i,j
=
u
i,j
−
ˉ
1
r
k
+1
i,j
,
(12)
where
ˉ
1
>
0 is the relaxation factor. Collecting (12), we have the new concrete
scheme:
=
u
i,j
+
ˉ
1
ʾI
i,j
+
ʾg
i,j
+2
μ
[
C
E
u
i,j
+1
+
C
W
u
k
+1
+
C
S
u
i
+1
,j
]
+
C
N
u
k
+1
i−
1
,j
i,j−
1
u
k
+1
i,j
1+
ˉ
1
2
μ
(
C
E
+
C
W
+
C
N
+
C
S
)+
ʾ
.
(13)
2.2 Split Bregman method for solving
ψ
Now, we will apply the split Bregman method [11] to solve (7). First, we define
ˁ
(
ˈ
):=
μ
ʩ
ˈ
)
2
2
d
x
,
(1
−
|∇
u
|
(14)
and
⊧
⊨
1
,
ˈ>
1
,
Tr
(
ˈ
):=
ˈ,
0
≤
ˈ
≤
1
,
(15)
⊩
0
,
ˈ<
0
.
to make sure that
ˈ
[0
,
1] for every iteration [8]. Here, we introduce an auxiliary
variable
d
and solve the following problem:
∈
d
x
+
ˁ
(
ˈ
)
subject to
d
=(
d
1
,d
2
)=
min
ˈ
ʩ
|
d
|
∇
ˈ,
=
d
1
+
d
2
and
ˁ
(
ˈ
) is defined in (14). Following the technique in
[11], the split Bregman iteration can be formulated as
where
|
d
|
−
b
n
)
2
d
x
,
(16)
d
x
+
ˁ
(
ˈ
)+
ʻ
2
(
ˈ
n
+1
,
d
n
+1
)=argmin
ˈ,
d
ʩ
|
d
|
(
d
−∇
ˈ
ʩ
for given
b
n
,and
b
n
+1
=
b
n
+(
ˈ
n
+1
−
d
n
+1
)
.
∇
(17)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search