Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
k is
fixed from the conditions of best approximation by ( 2.71 ). Then the Eq. ( 2.69 )
is replaced by the approximate equation:
y ¼exp ð kx Þ X
m
a i x i
~
;
ð 2
:
72 Þ
i¼0
which can be easily solved. For the error
x Þ ¼y ð x Þ~
y ð x Þ , we obtain an equation
from ( 2.69 )to( 2.72 ):
e ðÞ ¼f ðÞ exp kx
ð
Þ P m ðÞ R m ðÞ
ð 2 : 73 Þ
Solving Eq. ( 2.73 ), we have
1
n þ k
j n
ð b a Þ
M k
j
x Þ
;
!
k
!
k¼0
where
s Þ ¼ X
n
i 1
p i ð x s Þ
M ¼
a s x b K ð x
max
j
;
s Þ
j;
g ¼ max
½a
j
R m ð x Þ
j;
K ð x
;
ð i 1 Þ!
;
b
i¼1
2.12.5.5 Re
nements of Approximate Solutions of Volterra Integral
Equations
Let us consider Volterra integral equation of the
first and of the second kind arising
in the remote monitoring problems:
Z
x
k
G ð x ; y Þuð y Þ dy ¼ g ð x Þ;
ð 2
:
74 Þ
a
Z
x
x Þk
K ð x
;
y Þuð y Þ dy ¼ f ð x Þ;
ð 2
:
75 Þ
a
where x [a,b], the kernel K(x,y) and its derivatives K x ð x ; y Þ are continuous in the
region R{a
b}, f(x) is a continuously differentiable function in (a,b),
the kernek G(x,y) and g(x) are twice continuously differentiable functions of x,
G(x,x)
y
x
0. Then, as it is known, Eqs. ( 2.74 ) and ( 2.75 ) have unique solutions
ˆ 1 (x) and
ˆ 2 (x) respectively which are continuous and differentiable in [a,b] for any
ʻ
value of
. The case when G(x,x) = 0 for some point in the interval [a,b] or for the
entire interval needs special consideration. In our case, Eq. ( 2.74 ) is equivalent to
the equation of second kind
Search WWH ::




Custom Search