Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
References
Alavi, H., Dillenbourg, P., & Kaplan, F. (2009) Distributed Awareness for Class Orchestration.
Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning
(EC-
TEL09). Nice France, Sept. 2009
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Sikes, J., Stephan, G., & Snapp, M. (1978).
The jigsaw classroom
.Beverly
Hills, CA: Sage Publication.
Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environ-
ments with technology.
Journal of the Learning Sciences
,
15
(3), 301-329.
Blaye, A. (1988) Confrontation socio-cognitive et résolution de problèmes.
Doctoral dissertation
,
Centre de Recherche en Psychologie Cognitive, Université de Provence, France.
Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M.
(1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix &
R. Spiro (Eds.),
Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology
(pp. 115-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),
Handbook of research on teaching
(3rd ed.). New York: McMillan.
Brousseau, G. (1998).
Théorie des situations didactique
s. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.
Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fore: Open education, the long tail and learning 2.0.
Educause Review
,
43
(1), 16-32.
Carey, D. M. (1994). Teacher roles and technology integration: Moving from teacher as director to
teacher as facilitator.
Computers in the Schools
,
9
(2), 105-118.
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon &T. O'Shea (Eds.),
New
directions in educational technology
(pp. 15-22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Copeland, W. D. (1979). Student teachers and cooperating teachers: An ecological relationship.
Theory into Practice
,
18
(3), The Complex Classroom: A Research Focus, 194-199.
DiGiano, C., & Patton, C. (2002). Orchestrating handhelds in the classroom with SRI's
ClassSync
TM
.InG.Stahl(Ed.),
Computer support for collaborative learning 2002
(pp.
706-707). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with
instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.),
Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL
?
(pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Integrating technologies into educational ecosystems.
Distance Education
,
29
(2), 127-140.
Dillenbourg, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Basics of computer-supported collaborative learning.
Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik
,
21
, 111-130.
Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts.
International Journal
of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
,
3
(1), 5-23.
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl,
J. Haake & I. Kollar (Eds.),
Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning - cog-
nitive, computational, and educational perspectives
(pp. 275-301). Computer-Supported
Collaborative Learning Series. New York: Springer.
Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro CSCL scripts.
Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning
,
23
(1), 1-13.
Ferguson, R. F., Ludwig, J., & Rich, W. (2001). A diagnostic analysis of black-white GPA
disparities in shaker heights.
Ohio Brookings Papers on Education Policy
,
4
, 347-414.
Fiala, M. (2005). ARTag, A Fiducial Marker System using Digital Techniques.
IEEE Proc. CVPR
.
San Diego, CA, June 2005.
Fischer, F., Wecker, C., Schrader, J., Gerjets, P. H., & Hesse, F. W. (2005, August).
Use-inspired
basic research on the orchestration of cognition
,
instruction and technology in the classroom
.
Paper presented at the SIG Invited Symposium “Instructional design and empirical research:
Experiments and/or design experiments” at the 11th Conference of the European Association
for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Nicosia, Cyprus.
