Hardware Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 14.5 The
configuration proposed by
Yuce for the realization of
positive/negative parallel
R-L impedances (Adapted
from [
17
]
©
2006 Springer)
y
1
I
in
DVCC±
z
V
in
y
2
x
Y
in
R
2
C
R
1
demonstrated by Zeki and Toker in [
16
] by realizing a gyrator and a simulated
inductor with the feature of electronic-controllability through external gate control
voltages applied to the MOSFETs.
The gyrator circuit proposed by Zeki and Toker in [
16
] is shown here in
Fig.
14.6a
. By a straight forward analysis, the y-matrix of this circuit is found to be:
C
ox
L
2
V
G
2
0
2
μ
ð
V
th
Þ
C
ox
L
1
V
G
1
½
¼
Y
ð
14
:
7
Þ
μ
ð
V
th
Þ
2
0
In view of the above, it is obvious that this gyrator can be used as a simulated
inductor by terminating either port 2 or port 1 into a grounded capacitor. For
instance, with a capacitor C
1
connected at port 2, the input impedance looking
into the port 1 is given by:
sC
1
2
C
ox L
1
L
2
V
G
1
Z
in
¼
ð
14
:
8
Þ
4
μ
ð
V
th
Þ
ð
V
G
2
V
th
Þ
Hence, grounded inductor value (L
eq
) is given by:
C
1
2
C
ox L
1
L
2
V
G
1
L
eq
¼
ð
14
:
9
Þ
4
μ
ð
V
th
Þ
ð
V
G
2
V
th
Þ
which can be controlled by V
G1
or V
G2
or by both.
The validity of the DXCCII-based gyrator of Fig.
14.6a
was verified by realizing
a CM biquad filter (see Fig.
14.2b
of [
16
]) wherein the CMOS DXCCII from [
56
]
was used to simulate the inductor with
2.5 V DC power supplies and biasing
current of I
B
¼100
μ
A using BSIM3v3 model parameters of AMS 0.35
μ
m CMOS
process. The capacitors of values C
1
¼
10 pF were used. The channel
length (L) and channel width (W) for MOSFETs M
1
and M
2
was taken as 1.5
7 pF and C
2
¼
m.
The variation of cutoff frequency with gate voltage is shown in Fig.
14.6b
which
confirms the validity of the simulated inductor.
μ
Search WWH ::
Custom Search