Hardware Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 14.5 The
configuration proposed by
Yuce for the realization of
positive/negative parallel
R-L impedances (Adapted
from [ 17 ] © 2006 Springer)
y 1
I in
DVCC±
z
V in
y 2
x
Y in
R 2
C
R 1
demonstrated by Zeki and Toker in [ 16 ] by realizing a gyrator and a simulated
inductor with the feature of electronic-controllability through external gate control
voltages applied to the MOSFETs.
The gyrator circuit proposed by Zeki and Toker in [ 16 ] is shown here in
Fig. 14.6a . By a straight forward analysis, the y-matrix of this circuit is found to be:
C ox L 2 V G 2
0
2
μ
ð
V th
Þ
C ox L 1 V G 1
½ ¼
Y
ð
14
:
7
Þ
μ
ð
V th
Þ
2
0
In view of the above, it is obvious that this gyrator can be used as a simulated
inductor by terminating either port 2 or port 1 into a grounded capacitor. For
instance, with a capacitor C 1 connected at port 2, the input impedance looking
into the port 1 is given by:
sC 1
2 C ox L 1 L 2 V G 1
Z in ¼
ð
14
:
8
Þ
4
μ
ð
V th
Þ
ð
V G 2
V th
Þ
Hence, grounded inductor value (L eq ) is given by:
C 1
2 C ox L 1 L 2 V G 1
L eq ¼
ð
14
:
9
Þ
4
μ
ð
V th
Þ
ð
V G 2
V th
Þ
which can be controlled by V G1 or V G2 or by both.
The validity of the DXCCII-based gyrator of Fig. 14.6a was verified by realizing
a CM biquad filter (see Fig. 14.2b of [ 16 ]) wherein the CMOS DXCCII from [ 56 ]
was used to simulate the inductor with
2.5 V DC power supplies and biasing
current of I B ¼100 μ A using BSIM3v3 model parameters of AMS 0.35 μ m CMOS
process. The capacitors of values C 1 ¼
10 pF were used. The channel
length (L) and channel width (W) for MOSFETs M 1 and M 2 was taken as 1.5
7 pF and C 2 ¼
m.
The variation of cutoff frequency with gate voltage is shown in Fig. 14.6b which
confirms the validity of the simulated inductor.
μ
Search WWH ::




Custom Search