Global Positioning System Reference
In-Depth Information
t a/ 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
P |
t a/ 2 =
w 0 |≤
n ( 0 , 1 ) dx
=
1
− α
(4.359)
t a/ 2
or
t 1 a/ 2
P |
t a/ 2 =
w 0 |≥
n ( 0 , 1 ) dx
+
n( 0 , 1 )dx
= α
(4.360)
−∞
t a/ 2
% of the cases, the observations are rejected and remeasurement or inves-
tigations for error sources are performed, even though the observations are correct
(they do not contain a blunder). From Figure 4.10 it is seen that the probability
In 100
α
β i of
a type-II error, i.e., the probability of rejecting the alternative hypothesis (and accept-
ing the zero hypothesis) even though the alternative hypothesis is correct, depends on
the noncentrality factor
[15
i is not known, the noncentrality
factor is not known either. As a practical matter one can proceed in the reverse: one
can assume an acceptable probability
δ i . Because the blunder
β 0 for the error of the second kind and compute
the respective noncentrality parameter
Lin
1 ——
No
PgE
δ 0 . This parameter in turn is used to compute
the lower limit for the blunder, which can still be detected. Figure 4.10 shows that
t a/ 2
P |
t a/ 2 =
w a |≤
n(
δ i , 1 ) dx
≥ β 0
(4.361)
t a/ 2
if
δ i ≤ δ 0
(4.362)
[15
Figure 4.10
Defining the noncentrality.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search