Cryptography Reference
In-Depth Information
B ,welet f 1 ( J ) denote the set of all x such that f ( x )
all f ( x ) for x
J .
To denote the set of all images by f of elements that satisfy the predicate we write
{
I .If J
f ( x ); x
A
,
P ( x )
}
or f (
{
x
A ; P ( x )
}
).
A function can also be considered as a family , but for this we use sequence-like
notations. A family ( x i ) i I is essentially a function from I to another set which maps
i into an element x i . The set I is called the index set of the family. As an example a
sequence is a family whose index set is the set of all integers (which may start from zero
or one). A pair can be viewed as a family of index set
{
1
,
2
}
. In this case we just denote
( x 1 ,
x 3 ) for a triplet ( x i ) i ∈{ 1 , 2 , 3 } .
Given two sets A and B we define the Cartesian product A
x 2 ) instead of ( x i ) i ∈{ 1 , 2 } . Similarly we write ( x 1 ,
x 2 ,
×
B as the set of all pairs
( x
C of all triplets
consisting of elements in A , B , and C respectively. For simplicity we consider
,
y ) for which x
A and y
B . We similarly define the set A
×
B
×
×
to be
associative in the sense that we do not make any difference between ( A
×
B )
×
C and
A
×
( B
×
C ). (Formally we would consider ( A
×
B )
×
C as the set of all pairs whose
first component is a pair belonging to A
×
B and the second one is an element of C .)
Given a family ( A i ) i I of sets we can define the intersection
A i
i
I
and the union
A i
i I
of all A i . We also define the Cartesian product
A i
i I
as the set of all families ( x i ) i I for which x i
I . When all A i are equal
to a single set A we write this product A I . We also write A 2 instead of A { 1 , 2 } , and more
generally A n instead of A { 1 ,..., n } .
A i for all i
A binary relation R between elements of a set A and elements of a set B is formally
a subset of A
y ) is in this subset, we say that x and y are related by R and
denote this by xRy . When A
×
B .If( x
,
=
B , we say that R is reflexive if xRx for all x
A .We
say that it is symmetric if xRy is equivalent to yRx for all x
,
y
A . We say that it is
transitive if xRy and yRz imply xRz for any x
A . R is an equivalence relation
if it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. In this case, denoting Cl( x )
,
y
,
z
={
y
A ; xRy
}
as for the “class of x ,” we have
Cl( x )
=
Cl( y )
⇐⇒
Cl( x )
Cl( y )
=∅⇐⇒
xRy
for all x
Cl( x ) we notice that all Cl( x ) build a partition of A , i.e. a
collection of subsets Cl( x ) of empty pairwise intersections whose union covers all of
,
y
A . Since x
Search WWH ::




Custom Search