Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
8.2.1 Ground State
We start our analysis of the extended Peierls-Hubbard hamiltonian in Eq. (
8.2
),
based on a Hartree-Fock HF approximation. Such a treatment is elementary, but it is
a good exercise to prepare ourselves before advanced calculations. In this approxi-
mation, we simply replace the interaction terms in Eq. (
8.2
) using this recipe:
n
l"
n
l#
! n
l"
hn
l#
iþhn
l"
in
l#
hn
l"
ihn
l#
i
n
l
n
lþ
1
! n
l
hn
lþ
1
iþhn
l
in
lþ
1
hn
l
ihn
lþ
1
i
n
o
;
X
C
lþ
1
s
C
ls
hC
ls
C
lþ
1
s
iþ
: hC
lþ
1
s
C
ls
ihC
ls
C
lþ
1
s
i
h.c
(8.4)
s
h...i
where the brackets
are the mean fields to be determined self-consistently. In
practical calculations, we start from
hC
ls
C
lþ
1
s
i¼m
ls
with
n
ls
being
and
m
ls
appropriate
c
-number distributions. Such an assumption enables us to make
a one-body mean-field hamiltonian as
hn
ls
i¼n
ls
and
X
X
N
1
ððt
0
þ V m
ls
ÞC
lþ
1
s
C
ls
þ
2
H
ePH2
;
HF
¼
h.c
: V m
ls
j
j
Þ
s¼";#
l¼
þ U
X
l¼
1
ðn
l"
n
l#
þ n
l"
n
l#
n
l"
n
l#
ÞþV
X
N
N
l¼
1
ðn
l
n
lþ
1
þ n
l
n
lþ
1
n
l
n
lþ
1
Þ
S
X
2
X
N
l¼
1
ðq
lþ
1
q
l
Þn
l
þ
N
S
q
l
:
ð
8
:
5
Þ
l¼
1
Assuming a classical distribution for
q
l
, we can now solve this hamiltonian very
easily. Since we only treat the case of zero temperature throughout this article, the
expectation values like
2 one-electron
orbitals for each spin (
N
e
is the total electron number). We then try iterations until
self-consistency conditions as
hn
ls
i
are obtained by selecting the lowest
N
e
=
hC
ls
C
lþ
1
s
i¼m
ls
are satisfied. Thus,
this is a type of mean-field treatment, while it is educational to emphasize that this is
a variational method at the same time. The variables like
hn
ls
i¼n
ls
and
n
ls
there work as
variational variables that minimize the expectation value of the original hamilto-
nian through the Slater determinant determined by Eq. (
8.5
). This variational
aspect, which is easily proved by taking functional derivatives of each one-electron
orbital function, is very important, since modern methods like a density-matrix
renormalization group DMRG treatment are also variational methods in a much
more extended meaning.
Returning to the CDW problem, it is natural to set
q
l
¼ q
0
ð
l
,
1
Þ
n
ls
¼
1
=
2
l
,and
m
ls
¼ m
. Moreover, using the Hellmann-Feynman theorem,
þdnð
1
Þ
Search WWH ::
Custom Search