Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
8.2.1 Ground State
We start our analysis of the extended Peierls-Hubbard hamiltonian in Eq. ( 8.2 ),
based on a Hartree-Fock HF approximation. Such a treatment is elementary, but it is
a good exercise to prepare ourselves before advanced calculations. In this approxi-
mation, we simply replace the interaction terms in Eq. ( 8.2 ) using this recipe:
n l" n l# ! n l" hn l# iþhn l" in l# hn l" ihn l# i
n l n 1 ! n l hn 1 iþhn l in 1 hn l ihn 1 i
n
o
;
X
C 1 s C ls hC ls C 1 s
: hC 1 s C ls ihC ls C 1 s i
h.c
(8.4)
s
h...i
where the brackets
are the mean fields to be determined self-consistently. In
practical calculations, we start from
hC ls C 1 s i¼m ls with n ls being
and m ls appropriate c -number distributions. Such an assumption enables us to make
a one-body mean-field hamiltonian as
hn ls i¼n ls and
X
X
N
1 ððt 0 þ V m ls ÞC 1 s C ls þ
2
H ePH2 ; HF ¼
h.c
: V m ls
j
j
Þ
s¼";#
þ U X
1 ðn l" n l# þ n l" n l# n l" n l# ÞþV X
N
N
1 ðn l n 1 þ n l n 1 n l n 1 Þ
S X
2 X
N
1 ðq 1 q l Þn l þ
N
S
q l :
ð
8
:
5
Þ
1
Assuming a classical distribution for q l , we can now solve this hamiltonian very
easily. Since we only treat the case of zero temperature throughout this article, the
expectation values like
2 one-electron
orbitals for each spin ( N e is the total electron number). We then try iterations until
self-consistency conditions as
hn ls i
are obtained by selecting the lowest N e =
hC ls C 1 s i¼m ls are satisfied. Thus,
this is a type of mean-field treatment, while it is educational to emphasize that this is
a variational method at the same time. The variables like
hn ls i¼n ls and
n ls there work as
variational variables that minimize the expectation value of the original hamilto-
nian through the Slater determinant determined by Eq. ( 8.5 ). This variational
aspect, which is easily proved by taking functional derivatives of each one-electron
orbital function, is very important, since modern methods like a density-matrix
renormalization group DMRG treatment are also variational methods in a much
more extended meaning.
Returning to the CDW problem, it is natural to set q l ¼ q 0 ð
l ,
1
Þ
n ls ¼
1
=
2
l ,and
m ls ¼ m . Moreover, using the Hellmann-Feynman theorem,
þdnð
1
Þ
Search WWH ::




Custom Search