Databases Reference
In-Depth Information
58. Hellmann, S., Lehmann, J., Auer, S.: Linked-data aware URI schemes for referencing text
fragments. In: ten Teije, A., Völker, J., Handschuh, S., Stuckenschmidt, H., d'Acquin, M.,
Nikolov, A., Aussenac-Gilles, N., Hernandez, N. (eds.) EKAW 2012. LNCS, vol. 7603, pp.
175-184. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
59. Hellmann, S., Lehmann, J., Unbehauen, J., Stadler, C., Lam, T.N., Strohmaier, M.:
Navigation-induced knowledge engineering by example. In: Takeda, H., Qu, Y., Mizoguchi,
R., Kitamura, Y. (eds.) JIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7774, pp. 207-222. Springer, Heidelberg
(2013)
60. Hillner, S., Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C.: Parallelizing limes for large-scale link discovery. In:
I'Semantics (2011)
61. Hogan, A., Harth, A., Passant, A., Decker, S., Polleres, A.: Weaving the pedantic web. In:
LDOW (2010)
62. Hogan, A., Umbrich, J., Harth, A., Cyganiak, R., Polleres, A., Decker, S.: An empirical
survey of linked data conformance. Journal of Web Semantics (2012)
63. Horridge, M., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Manchester syntax for OWL 1.1. In: OWLED 2008
(2008)
64. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: Swrl: A
semantic web rule language combining owl and ruleml. Technical report, W3C (May 2004)
65. HTML 5: A vocabulary and associated APIs for HTML and XHTML. W3C Working Draft
(August 2009)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-html5-20090825/
66. Iannone, L., Palmisano, I.: An algorithm based on counterfactuals for concept learning in
the semantic web. In: Ali, M., Esposito, F. (eds.) IEA
/
AIE 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3533,
pp. 370-379. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
67. Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Fanizzi, N.: An algorithm based on counterfactuals for concept
learning in the semantic web. Applied Intelligence 26(2), 139-159 (2007)
68. Inan, A., Kantarcioglu, M., Bertino, E., Scannapieco, M.: A hybrid approach to private
record linkage. In: ICDE, pp. 496-505 (2008)
69. Isele, R., Jentzsch, A., Bizer, C.: E
cient multidimensional blocking for link discovery
without losing recall. In: WebDB (2011)
70. Isele, R., Jentzsch, A., Bizer, C.: Active learning of expressive linkage rules for the web of
data. In: Brambilla, M., Tokuda, T., Tolksdorf, R. (eds.) ICWE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7387, pp.
411-418. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
71. Jacobs, I., Walsh, N.: Architecture of the world wide web, volume one. World Wide Web
Consortium, Recommendation REC-webarch-20041215 (December 2004)
72. Juran, J.: The Quality Control Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York (1974)
73. Kifer, M., Boley, H.: Rif overview. Technical report, W3C (June 2010),
74. Kim, S.N., Kan, M.-Y.: Re-examining automatic keyphrase extraction approaches in sci-
entific articles. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Identification,
Interpretation, Disambiguation and Applications, MWE 2009, pp. 9-16. Association for
Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2009)
75. Kim, S.N., Medelyan, O., Kan, M.-Y., Baldwin, T.: Semeval-2010 task 5: Automatic
keyphrase extraction from scientific articles. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Work-
shop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2010, pp. 21-26. Association for Computational
Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2010)
76. Köpcke, H., Thor, A., Rahm, E.: Comparative evaluation of entity resolution approaches
with fever. Proc. VLDB Endow. 2(2), 1574-1577 (2009)
77. Krötzsch, M., Vrandecic, D., Völkel, M., Haller, H., Studer, R.: Semantic wikipedia. Journal
of Web Semantics 5, 251-261 (2007)
78. Lehmann, J.: Hybrid learning of ontology classes. In: Perner, P. (ed.) MLDM 2007. LNCS
(LNAI), vol. 4571, pp. 883-898. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
