Databases Reference
In-Depth Information
11. Bishop, B., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanoff, D., Peikov, I., Tashev, Z., Velkov, R.:
OWLIM: A family of scalable semantic repositories. Semantic Web 2(1), 33-42
(2011)
12. Bonatti, P.A., Hogan, A., Polleres, A., Sauro, L.: Robust and scalable Linked Data
reasoning incorporating provenance and trust annotations. J. Web Sem. 9(2), 165-
201 (2011)
13. Brickley, D., Guha, R.: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema.
W3C Recommendation (February 2004),
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/
14. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Tractable
reasoning and e
cient query answering in description logics: The DL-Lite family.
Journal of Automated Reasoning 39(3), 385-429 (2007)
15. Cheng, G., Qu, Y.: Integrating lightweight reasoning into class-based query refine-
ment for object search. In: Domingue, J., Anutariya, C. (eds.) ASWC 2008. LNCS,
vol. 5367, pp. 449-463. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
16. de Bruijn, J., Heymans, S.: Logical foundations of (e)RDF(S): Complexity and
reasoning. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ISWC/ASWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp.
86-99. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
17. Delbru, R., Tummarello, G., Polleres, A.: Context-dependent OWL reasoning in
Sindice - experiences and lessons learnt. In: Rudolph, S., Gutierrez, C. (eds.) RR
2011. LNCS, vol. 6902, pp. 46-60. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
18. Emmons, I., Collier, S., Garlapati, M., Dean, M.: RDF literal data types in practice.
In: Proceedings of Workshop on Scalable Semantic Web Systems (SSWS). LNCS,
vol. 5947, Springer (2011)
19. Fielding, R.T., Gettys, J., Mogul, J.C., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P.J.,
Berners-Lee, T.: Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1. RFC 2616 (June 1999),
20. Fischer, F., Unel, G., Bishop, B., Fensel, D.: Towards a scalable, pragmatic knowl-
edge representation language for the Web. In: Pnueli, A., Virbitskaite, I., Voronkov,
A. (eds.) PSI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5947, pp. 124-134. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
21. Glimm, B.: Using SPARQL with RDFS and OWL entailment. In: Polleres, A.,
d'Amato, C., Arenas, M., Handschuh, S., Kroner, P., Ossowski, S., Patel-Schneider,
P. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2011. LNCS, vol. 6848, pp. 137-201. Springer, Heidelberg
(2011)
22. Glimm, B., Hogan, A., Krotzsch, M., Polleres, A.: OWL: Yet to arrive on the Web
of Data? In: LDOW, vol. 937. CEUR-WS.org (2012)
23. Glimm, B., Ogbuji, C.: SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes. W3C Recommendation
(March 2013),
http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/
24. Gottlob, G., Schwentick, T.: Rewriting ontological queries into small nonrecursive
datalog programs. In: 13th Int'l Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation
and Reasoning (KR 2012), Rome, Italy. AAAI Press (2012)
25. Grau, B.C., Motik, B., Wu, Z., Fokoue, A., Lutz, C.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Lan-
guage: Profiles. W3C Recommendation (October 2009),
26. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: com-
bining logic programs with description logic. In: WWW, pp. 48-57 (2003)
27. Guha, R.V.: Contexts: a formalization and some applications. PhD thesis, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA, USA (1992)
28. Guha, R., McCool, R., Fikes, R.: Contexts for the Semantic Web. In: McIlraith,
S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp.
32-46. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
