Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
d S t =
+
rS t d t
σS t d W t ,
d Y t =
S t d t.
We need the two-dimensional version of Proposition 4.1.1.
AS
A
Proposition 6.2.1 Let
denote the differential operator which is , for functions
C 2 , 1 (
f
R × R
) with bounded derivatives , given by
1
2 σ 2 s 2 ss f(s,y)
AS f )(x)
(
A
=
+
rs∂ s f(s,y)
+
s∂ y f(s,y).
(6.4)
Then , the process M t := f(S t ,Y t ) 0 ( A f )(S τ ,Y τ ) d τ is a martingale with respect
to the filtration of W .
Proof We apply the two-dimensional Itô formula
2 f
∂x 2 (X t ,Y t )
∂f
∂x (X t ,Y t ) d X t +
∂f
∂y (X t ,Y t ) d Y t +
1
2
( d X t ) 2
d f(X t ,Y t )
=
·
2 f
∂x∂y (X t ,Y t )
2 f
∂y 2 (X t ,Y t )
1
2
( d Y t ) 2 ,
+
·
d X t ·
d Y t +
·
to the vector process (S t ,Y t ) ∈ R
2
+
and obtain, using d t
·
d t
=
d t
·
d W
=
0,
AS f )(S t ,Y t ) d t + σS t ∂f
d f(S t ,Y t ) = ( A
∂x f(S t ,Y t ) d W t .
The result follows since it is shown in Proposition 4.1.1 that the stochastic integral
0 σS τ x f(S τ ,Y τ ) d W τ is a martingale with respect to the filtration of W .
Similar arguments as in Theorem 4.1.4 lead to the following PDE for V(t,s,y) ,
AS V
t V
+ A
rV
=
0 .
(6.5)
Equation ( 6.5 ) is a PDE in two variables, s and y . But it can be reduced to a univari-
ate one,
1
2 σ 2 (q(t)
z) 2 zz H
t H
+
+
r(q(t)
z)∂ z H
=
0in J
× R
,
(6.6)
with the terminal condition H(T,z)
(z) + . The function q(t) depends on the op-
tion type. We consider both cases, fixed and floating strike calls:
=
(i) The fixed strike call has the two-dimensional payoff g(s,y)
=
(y/T
K) + .We
t
set q(t)
=
1
T , introduce a new variable z
=
(y/T
K)/s
+
q(t) , and insert
the ansatz V(t,s,y)
=
sH(t,z) into ( 6.5 ) to obtain ( 6.6 ).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search