Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Definition 16.4.1
We call a
d
-dimensional Feller process with characteristic triplet
(γ (x), Q(x), ν(x,
d
z))
a time-homogeneous
admissible market model
if it satisfies
the following properties.
d
(i) The vector function
x
→
b(x)
∈ R
is smooth and bounded.
d
d
sym
×
→
∈ R
(ii) The matrix function
x
Q(x)
is smooth and bounded and, for all
d
, the matrix
Q(x)
is positive semidefinite.
(iii) The jump measure
ν(x,
d
z)
is constructed from
d
independent, univariate
Feller-Lévy measures with a 1-homogeneous copula function
F
that fulfills
the following estimate: there is a constant
C>
0 such that for all
u
∈ R
x
)
d
∈
(
R\{
0
}
0
and all
n
∈ N
it holds
d
∂
n
F(u)
≤
C
|
n
|+
1
1
|
u
i
|
−
n
i
.
|
n
|!
min
{|
u
1
|
,...,
|
u
d
|}
i
=
(iv) For the marginal densities
ν
i
(x
i
,
d
z
i
)
=
k
i
(x, z)
d
z
the mapping
x
i
→
ν
i
(x
i
,B)
)
.
(v) There exist univariate Lévy kernels
k
i
(z)
,
i
is smooth for all
B
∈
B
(
R
=
1
,...,d
, with semi-heavy tails,
i.e. which satisfy
C
e
−
β
−
|
z
|
,z<
−
1
,
≤
k
i
(z)
(16.19)
e
−
β
+
z
,
z>
1
,
for some constants
C>
0,
β
−
>
0 and
β
+
>
1. These Lévy kernels satisfy the
following estimates
0
≤
ν
i
(x
i
,B)
≤
k
i
(z)
d
z
∀
x
i
∈ R
,B
∈
B
(
R
), i
=
1
,...,d.
B
(vi) Besides, we require the following estimates on the derivatives of
k
i
(x, z)
∂
x
k
i
(x, z)
≤
C
n
+
1
n
! |
z
|
−
Y
i
(x)
−
δn
−
1
,
∂
z
k
i
(x, z)
≤
C
n
+
1
n
! |
z
|
−
Y
i
(x)
−
n
−
1
,
for any
δ
∈
(
0
,
1
)
, for all 0
=
z, x
∈ R
and
Y<
2aswellas
Y
>
0,
Y
i
(x)
=
Y
i
+
Y
i
(x)
,
Y
i
∈ R
+
and
Y
i
(x)
1
,...,d
.
(vii) Finally, we require
F
0
to be a 1-homogeneous Lévy copula and
k
i
(x
i
,z
i
)
to
be
Y
i
(x
i
)
-stable densities with tail integrals
U
i
(x
i
,z
i
)
,
i
∈
S
(
R
)
,
i
=
=
1
,...,d
such that
Ck
i
(x, z),
k
i
(x, z)
≥
∀
0
<
|
z
|
<
1
,
∀
x
∈ R
,i
=
1
,...,d,
∂
n
F
0
(U
0
(x, z))
∂
1
···
∂
n
F(U(x,z))
≥
C∂
1
···
∀
0
<
|
z
|
<
1
,
for some constant
C>
0.
=
Remark 16.4.2
Note that the smoothness assumptions on
Y
i
(x
i
)
,
i
1
,...,d
,are
necessary in order to obtain symbols as given in Definition
16.2.2
. We confine the
discussion to such symbols in order to use the results of [137] that rely on pseu-
dodifferential calculus for symbols of variable order, cf. [86, 104]. The derivation
of similar results for symbols with lower regularity is open to our knowledge.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search