Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
where X is a Lévy process with characteristic triplet 2 ,ν,γ) under a non-unique
EMM. As shown in Lemma 10.1.5 , the martingale condition implies
σ 2
2
(e z
γ
=−
1
z)ν( d z).
R
We again want to compute the value of the option in log-price with payoff g which
is the conditional expectation
v(t,x) = E[ e r(T t) g(e rT + X T ) | X t = x ] .
We show that v(t,x) is a solution of a deterministic partial integro-differential equa-
tion (PIDE). To prove the Feynman-Kac theorem for Lévy processes, we need a
generalization of Proposition 4.1.1.
Proposition 10.3.1 Let X be a Lévy process with characteristic triplet (σ 2 ,ν,γ)
where the Lévy measure satisfies ( 10.11 ). Denote by
A
the integro-differential oper-
ator
1
2 σ 2 xx f(x)
(
A
f )(x)
=
+
γ∂ x f(x)
+
(f (x
+
z)
f(x)
z∂ x f (x))ν( d z),
(10.14)
R
C 2 (
for functions f
R
) with bounded derivatives . Then , the process M t :=
f(X t )
0 (
A
f )(X s ) d s is a martingale with respect to the filtration of X .
Proof We need the Itô formula for Lévy processes which is given in differential
form by
σ 2
2
d f(X t )
=
x f(X t
) d X t +
xx f(X t ) d t
+
f(X t )
f(X t
)
X t x f(X t
).
Using the Lévy-Itô decomposition
z J X ( d t, d z),
d X t =
γ d t
+
σ d W t +
R\{
0
}
we obtain
d f(X t )
=
x f(X t d t
+
σ∂ x f(X t ) d W t
x f(X t )
σ 2
2
z J X ( d t, d z)
+
+
xx f(X t ) d t
R\{
0
}
+
f(X t +
z)
f(X t )
z∂ x f(X t )J X ( d t, d z)
R\{
0
}
=
(
A
f )(X t
) d t
+
σ(X t )∂ x f(X t
) d W t
f(X t ))J X ( d t, d z).
As already showed in Proposition 4.1.1, the process 0 σ(X s )∂ x f(X s ) d W s is a mar-
+
(f (X t +
z)
R\{
0
}
tingale. Therefore, it remains to show that t
0
))J X ( d s, d z)
(f (X s +
z)
f(X s
R\{
0
}
Search WWH ::




Custom Search