Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
where
X
is a Lévy process with characteristic triplet
(σ
2
,ν,γ)
under a non-unique
EMM. As shown in Lemma
10.1.5
, the martingale condition implies
σ
2
2
−
(e
z
γ
=−
−
1
−
z)ν(
d
z).
R
We again want to compute the value of the option in log-price with payoff
g
which
is the conditional expectation
v(t,x)
= E[
e
−
r(T
−
t)
g(e
rT
+
X
T
)
|
X
t
=
x
]
.
We show that
v(t,x)
is a solution of a deterministic
partial integro-differential equa-
tion
(PIDE). To prove the Feynman-Kac theorem for Lévy processes, we need a
generalization of Proposition 4.1.1.
Proposition 10.3.1
Let X be a Lévy process with characteristic triplet (σ
2
,ν,γ)
where the Lévy measure satisfies
(
10.11
).
Denote by
A
the integro-differential oper-
ator
1
2
σ
2
∂
xx
f(x)
(
A
f )(x)
=
+
γ∂
x
f(x)
+
(f (x
+
z)
−
f(x)
−
z∂
x
f (x))ν(
d
z),
(10.14)
R
C
2
(
for functions f
∈
R
) with bounded derivatives
.
Then
,
the process M
t
:=
f(X
t
)
−
0
(
A
f )(X
s
)
d
s is a martingale with respect to the filtration of X
.
Proof
We need the Itô formula for Lévy processes which is given in differential
form by
σ
2
2
d
f(X
t
)
=
∂
x
f(X
t
−
)
d
X
t
+
∂
xx
f(X
t
)
d
t
+
f(X
t
)
−
f(X
t
−
)
−
X
t
∂
x
f(X
t
−
).
Using the Lévy-Itô decomposition
z J
X
(
d
t,
d
z),
d
X
t
=
γ
d
t
+
σ
d
W
t
+
R\{
0
}
we obtain
d
f(X
t
)
=
∂
x
f(X
t
−
)γ
d
t
+
σ∂
x
f(X
t
−
)
d
W
t
∂
x
f(X
t
−
)
σ
2
2
z J
X
(
d
t,
d
z)
+
+
∂
xx
f(X
t
)
d
t
R\{
0
}
+
f(X
t
−
+
z)
−
f(X
t
−
)
−
z∂
x
f(X
t
−
)J
X
(
d
t,
d
z)
R\{
0
}
=
(
A
f )(X
t
−
)
d
t
+
σ(X
t
)∂
x
f(X
t
−
)
d
W
t
f(X
t
−
))J
X
(
d
t,
d
z).
As already showed in Proposition 4.1.1, the process
0
σ(X
s
)∂
x
f(X
s
)
d
W
s
is a mar-
+
(f (X
t
−
+
z)
−
R\{
0
}
tingale. Therefore, it remains to show that
t
0
))J
X
(
d
s,
d
z)
(f (X
s
−
+
z)
−
f(X
s
−
R\{
0
}
Search WWH ::
Custom Search