Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
15.5
CONCLUSIONS
In this chapter we attempted to show that the treatment of nonlinear problems is almost
as straightforward as with the FEM. Only two types of nonlinear problems have been
discussed: plasticity and contact problems. In the first type, additional volume
discretisation is needed and the BEM looses a bit of its attraction. However, it was
pointed out that the internal cell discretisation does not add to the number of unknown
and that all the advantages of the BEM are still retained. It must be admitted, however,
that the effort in programming, especially dealing with hyper-singular integrations, is
rather involved.
We have also found that for contact problems the BEM is better suited than the FEM
because the interface stresses required for checking the yield conditions are directly
obtained from the solution. In the FEM these would have to be determined by
differentiation of the computed displacement field. The purpose of this chapter has been
to demonstrate that any type of nonlinear problem can be solved with the BEM.
However, the computer implementation has not been discussed in any detail here
because it would be beyond the scope of an introductory text.
15.6
REFERENCES
1. Hill R.(1950) The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity . Oxford University Press.
2. Pande G., Beer G. and Williams J. (1990) Numerical methods in rock mechanics.
J.Wiley, Chichester.
3. Simo J.C. and Hughes T.J.R. (1998) Computational Inelasticity. Volume 7 of
Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics. Springer-Verlag New York.
4. Ortiz M. and Popov E. (1985) Accuracy and stability of integration algorithms for
elastoplastic constitutive relations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng . 21: 1561-1576.
5. Cormeau I.C. (1975) Numerical stability in quasi-static elasto-viscoplasticity. Int. J.
Numer. Methods Eng . 9 (1).
6. Ribeiro S.A.T. (2006) Elastoplastic boundary element method with adaptive cell
generation. Monographic Series TU Graz, Austria.
7. Venturini W.S. (1983) Boundary Element Method in Geomechanics. Springer,
Berlin.
8. Telles J.C.F. (1983) The Boundary Element Method Applied to Inelastic Problems.
Springer, Berlin.
9. Gao X.-W. and Davies T.G. (2002) Boundary Element Programming in Mechanics .
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Prager W. and Hodge P.G. (1951) Theory of Perfectly Plastic Solids. John Wiley &
Sons, New York.
11. Beer G. (1993) An efficient numerical method for modeling initiation and
propagation of cracks along material interfaces. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng . 36
(21), 3579-3594.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search