Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 16.5
The factors from the factor analysis with the concepts that were
unanimously matched to the factors
Factor Interpretation based on concepts
Police 1 Opposed, negative approval, annoy
2 Together, positive approval, attention, positivity
3 Lie, withhold info
4 Submissive
5 Together, positive approval, positivity
6 Dominant, negative autonomy, confront
7 Opposed, negative approval
8 -
9 Dominant
10 -
11 -
12 Dominant
13 -
Suspect 1 Dominant, opposed, negative approval, annoy
2 Together, positive approval, coordination, attention, positivity
3 Submissive
4 Together, positive approval, attention, positivity
5 Opposed, negative approval, annoy
6 Questioning
7 Evade
8 Surround
9 -
10 -
11 -
12 Together, coordination, attention, positivity
13 -
A dash means no concepts were unanimously matched to the factor
Our methodology makes clear how the theories are related to each other. For
each factor, concepts from different theories can be applicable. This
co-occurrence
of concepts
suggests that the corresponding theories are related. In Table
16.6
we show in how many factors concepts co-occur. For example, the interpersonal
stance
together
co-occurs in more than one factor to:
positive approval
, a con-
cept underlying face (4 co-occurrences), and
coordination
(2),
attention
(4), and
positivity
(5), which underlie rapport (see Table
16.6
). This is indicative of a
strong link between these concepts. The concept of
dominance
co-occurs with the
concepts:
opposed stance
,
negative autonomy
,
negative approval
,
confrontation
and
annoy
(see Table
16.6
). To investigate this relation further, we look at Fig.
16.4
,
which shows that suspect factor 1 was matched with the concepts dominance,
opposed, negative approval, and annoy. For the police factors dominance co-occurs
with negative autonomy and confront. This is likely due to the different roles the
Search WWH ::
Custom Search